The Intel 80286 chip was used in the IBM AT computer, introduced in 1984. They are fine for DOS, although the clocking speeds are slow by modern standards. If you try to run Windows on a 286-based PC, it will run VERY slowly and only in Standard Mode (assuming you have 2 MB of RAM installed). The Virtual Memory capabilities of the 286 are very inefficient. Swapping is performed at segment level (using 64 KB chunks). The method of switching between Real Mode (used to access the first 1 MB of Conventional Memory) and Protected Mode (above 1 MB) is very cumbersome. As well as the slow clocking speed, the other main disadvantage of this chip is that, like the 8086 chip, the data and address lines are multiplexed (i.e. the same lines are used for addressing and data
• 80286 is a 16 bit processor
• 80286 has a 16 bit data bus and separate 24 bit non-multiplexed address bus.
• 24 bit address bus allows the processor to access 16M bytes of physical memory
• 80286 in PVAM can address up to 8192 virtual memory segment of 64k bytes each.
The 80286 then has a virtual address space of 1 Gigabyte.
memory management and data protection capability
Applications which have been designed to take advantage of mult-core processors will run about twice as fast on a quad core processor as compared to a dual core processor.
Modern processors and computer components use silicone. Older processors such as the 80486 and Pentium used ceramic on the original chips, and switched to silicone.
No. An 80487 would have been a math coprocessor for an 80486 general-purpose microprocessor...just like the 8087 was the math coprocessor for the 8086 and 8088, the 80287 for the 80286, and the 80387 was for the 80386. The 80486 was the first Intel processor to contain an on-chip math coprocessor, so there wouldn't have been an 80487 because it wasn't necessary.
Intel processors since the 80486, and some of its competitors, have a special instruction known as CPUID. This returns a numerical value that the kernel reads, and can identify what processor is in the system.
Not sure if it's the first but:"Intel processors later than the 80486 integrated floating-point hardware on the main processor chip" source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprocessor#Modern_PC_coprocessorsCouldn't find anything about Motorola processors with math coprocessors built-in.I believe AMD was just behind Intel with the processor design.
hhh
The Intel 80486 was a microprocessor family produced by Intel introduced in 1989. It was their first 86 processor with a math coprocessor built into it. It's predecessor family were the 386 family and it's sucessor was the Pentium chip
The numbers 8086 most often refer to the first generation of 16 bit computer processor chips. These where made by Intel. Later generations where named 80186, 80286, 80386, and 80486 often dropping the 80 prefix.
2 mb
advantage: directly pass input to processor disadvantage: take away memory from a system file to implement a cache
An advantage of the Core i3 processor is that it is faster than previous processors such as the Pentium 4. A disadvantage is that the i5 and i7 are generally faster.
They are two different companies. Cyrix is a smaller company, their processors are not as performant as Intel ones, however they would exponse exactly the same set of instructions. Regardless the lack of performance compared with Intel, Cyrix had a very good market in the mid 90s, for people that did not have the money to purchase Intel. Instead of purchasing an Intel at 166 Mhz with 400 dollars, one could purchase a Cyrix at 150 Mhz for only 99 dollars. Of course, the performance of the cyrix would be far smaller, but the price difference would make it worthwile. Had a Cyrix between 97 and 2000. Was very happy with it.