Want this question answered?
I think it might be because probes are cheaper and just in case something goes wrong, it would not end up resulting in loss of life. (Just an opinion though.)
there are no people in space. plenty of space though... A: At any given time at the moment, there are people building robotic vehicles, that will go out into the surface of mars. Probes are sent to the moon, and are now taking pictures of the dark side of the moon. There are plenty of sites such as NASA and others showing their progress. There may not be any alien out there, but if we keep sending probes further and further into space, we might be considered the alien's, sending probes into outer space, and studying new worlds.
Sometimes the obvious answer is the right one. In general computers can break, malfunction and develop faults. Humans have a level of intelligence that computers and machines just can't have, so sending people into space is useful because they have senses like touch and can repair machines or pilot spacecraft. But, human life is sacred, there's (as you can understand) quite a risk associated with space travel. Humans are designed to live on earth; space is an unnatural habitat for us. If not careful, people could die on space missions etc.
Yes, by sending probes mostly, they go from earth to space, and what about cameras atached to satalites, plus rockets, they are all technology.
no they don't i have heard of them sending up a K9 (a dog ) and a monkey and also satellite dishes but that's about it!
pros: We can learn lots of things by sending crews and space probes. For without space probes how would we be able to tell the weather. cons: Many humans can die in space if there is a problem with the space craft and billions of dollars will be wasted.
I think it might be because probes are cheaper and just in case something goes wrong, it would not end up resulting in loss of life. (Just an opinion though.)
there are no people in space. plenty of space though... A: At any given time at the moment, there are people building robotic vehicles, that will go out into the surface of mars. Probes are sent to the moon, and are now taking pictures of the dark side of the moon. There are plenty of sites such as NASA and others showing their progress. There may not be any alien out there, but if we keep sending probes further and further into space, we might be considered the alien's, sending probes into outer space, and studying new worlds.
Sometimes the obvious answer is the right one. In general computers can break, malfunction and develop faults. Humans have a level of intelligence that computers and machines just can't have, so sending people into space is useful because they have senses like touch and can repair machines or pilot spacecraft. But, human life is sacred, there's (as you can understand) quite a risk associated with space travel. Humans are designed to live on earth; space is an unnatural habitat for us. If not careful, people could die on space missions etc.
by sending space probes to space like the mars rover helps us understand the climate, etc. so when we get there we know what were dealing with and where to land
People need air to breathe, food to eat, water to drink, efficient shielding from space radiation, temperature maintained within a small range, and they want to return to Earth, alive. Unmanned robotic probes don't.
i dono
An unmanned space probe is much cheaper than a manned space probe, and if you are not sending humans, basically no human lives are risked. Also, on very long trips, like to other solar systems, it is extremely problematic to send people on a trip from which they will never return.
By observing them regularly using telescopes and by sending orbital or lander probes to them.
NASA occasionally sends out space probes instead of humans because astronauts could not survive on some of the places that space probes are sent to.
People
Simpler and cheaper.