pros: We can learn lots of things by sending crews and space probes. For without space probes how would we be able to tell the weather.
cons: Many humans can die in space if there is a problem with the space craft and billions of dollars will be wasted.
having fun
Advantages of crewed missions include the ability for humans to make real-time decisions, conduct complex tasks, and better cope with unexpected situations. Disadvantages include higher costs, greater risk to the crew's safety, and limitations on mission duration and distance due to life support requirements.
list all human explorations from satellite probes to planet neptune with a satellite name and date
By observing them regularly using telescopes and by sending orbital or lander probes to them.
Sometimes the obvious answer is the right one. In general computers can break, malfunction and develop faults. Humans have a level of intelligence that computers and machines just can't have, so sending people into space is useful because they have senses like touch and can repair machines or pilot spacecraft. But, human life is sacred, there's (as you can understand) quite a risk associated with space travel. Humans are designed to live on earth; space is an unnatural habitat for us. If not careful, people could die on space missions etc.
No. We have sent probes to Jupiter, which have studied Jupiter and its moons, but nothing has landed on it. No human has gone farther than Earth's moon.
Sending people into orbit allows for real-time decision-making and adaptability, as astronauts can respond to unexpected challenges and conduct complex tasks that might be difficult for automated systems. Human presence also facilitates advanced scientific research, as crew members can perform experiments, troubleshoot issues, and make observations that may be beyond the capabilities of robotic probes. Additionally, crewed missions can inspire public interest and support for space exploration, fostering a sense of connection to the journey and its discoveries.
Sending space probes is cheaper than sending people to other planets because space probes are typically smaller, lighter, and require less infrastructure to support life support systems and return missions. Human missions have to account for the safety, health, and well-being of the astronauts, resulting in significantly higher costs. Additionally, space probes can be designed for specific tasks and don't require return trips, whereas human missions would need to account for the return journey.
Humans have not yet explored the planet Saturn, aside from sending a few probes to it. It would take decades to reach Saturn with modern technology, making sending an astronaut team there impractical.
Manned missions allow for real time interaction with the environment instead of waiting for sent commands to be processed, and confirmation returned. But manned missions require expensive, large habitable environments and support systems to keep the astronauts alive.
To send a person to another planet, you would also have to send everything else that keeps that person alive. For every kg that you send into space you have to pay a huge sum of money, it costs loads of money in fuel. So to send a person you have to then consider the cost of sending the food they need, water, oxygen and everything else for the duration of the trip. For a probe, you just need to sent the equipment and a power source.
by sending space probes to space like the mars rover helps us understand the climate, etc. so when we get there we know what were dealing with and where to land