Want this question answered?
Lavoiser rejected the phlogiston theory!
the evidence that the phlogistan theory was correct was that there was heat and by the way this is definetly correct
A russain soviet called Malinovka Sosujragxy disproved the Phlogiston theory and discovered Oxygen instead was helped by his main colleague, Joe Lee.
Most people in the scientific community accepted it in the 18th century.
I think that it was Antoine Lavoiser that invented it but I am not that sure so you may need a second opinion!
a combustible material is made up of 2 parts: the calx and phlogiston when a substance burnt the phlogiston into air and calx(ash) left behind so there are no good points of this theory
Lavoiser rejected the phlogiston theory!
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.
The phlogiston theory was first proposed by Johann Joachim Becher in 1667. This theory is now considered obsolete and was replaced by the oxygen theory.
There was no evidence until at least 2 yrs into the work of the phlogiston theory
because it changed their mind to belive that phlogiston is in flammable things.
The phlogiston theory was not able to give satisfactory explanations of diverse energy conversions that involved heat energy. For example, through friction you can generate an almost unlimited amount of heat energy from a device.
Lavoisier is consider the first modern important chemist. The phlogiston theory was created in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher. This theory is false.
Proposed the theory of burning called the phlogiston theory
I don' t know
No. Phlogiston was a theory considered to be fact and actually hindered scientific knowledge until it was discredited. The theory was used to explain certain observations about flame, oxidation, and the formation of certain compounds, most noticeably cinnabar. As with some theories, phlogiston used variable factors to explain anomalies. For instance it was assumed to have negative weight under certain circumstances. Once oxidation was properly understood phlogiston theory was no longer considered true.