0
The Roman monarchy was not hereditary. The kings of Rome were elected. When the king died, there was a period called interregnum (in between reigns) during which the senate took charge of Rome and debated about candidates for the kingship. The candidate then had to be elected by the people gathered in the comitia curiata (the assembly of the wards). It is not known whether the senate chose only one candidate or several candidates to be put to the popular vote. Once elected the king became the head of the city and the army and his office was for life. The king made all the decisions and consulted the senate which was the advisory body of the king.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThere were three people's assemblies (Centuriate, Tribal and Plebeian) which made decisions on specific issues. The Senate was responsible to implement them. Two consuls (one Patrician, one Plebeian)presided in the Senate and led the armies. When there was a serious crisis - political or military - the Senate could appoint a Dictator and Master of Horse for six months to resolve it.
There were also 10 Tribunes of the Plebs who sat in the Senate and veto power. After their year, they became senators, as was the Plebeian consul, which saw an increasing percentage of Plebs in the Senate.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoChief Keef , O'Block , 3Hunna , Sosa , Bang Bang ! , B ! , Buck Buck ! ,
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoIt utilized a balance of powers.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true that the roman republic was not much like a constitutional monarchy?
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
What was not a part of the Roman REPBULIC?
Monarchy.
What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
When did monarchy end in rome?
The Roman Monarchy ended with the overthrow of the last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, who was a tyrant in 509 BC.
How long ago was ancient rome formed?
There were three governments in Ancient Rome: there was the Roman monarchy, the Roman Republic, and the Roman Empire. The Roman Monarchy (753 BC--509 BC) was your average monarchy. The Roman Republic (509 BC--27 BC) was a Representative form of government. The Roman Empire (27 BC-AD 476) formed when the Roman Republic was removed (some accounts claim by Julius Caesar).
What are Prussia monarchy characteristics?
Awesome.
The early roman government was a-?
The early Roman government was a monarchy (for 244 years, 753-509 B.C.).
Is it true that the roman republic was not much like a constitutional monarchy?
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
What are some limitations of the monarchy of the roman republic?
A Republic is not a monarchy, it does not have a king. Several republics were formed when a monarchy was overthrown. The Roman Republic was one such case. They got rid of the kings
What was not a part of the Roman REPBULIC?
Monarchy.
What are some characteristics of a monarchy government?
qeens and kings
What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?
There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.
How long did the Roman Morachy last?
The Roman monarchy lasted about 243 years.
What was the roman monarchy?
wher the king or queen rules.
Who changed the roman empire into absolute monarchy?
Diocletian
How is monarchy and dictatorship share the characteristics?
Only they are both absolute governments.
How did the Roman Monarchy begin?
It started 753 B.C. and i believe it ended 509 B.C. because that's when the Roman Republic started.
