The relationship is given by Kepler's Third Law.
The planets rotation does not really relate to the orbital period. Some planets like Mercury and Venus and Mars orbit the sun in a short time, but take a long time to rotate on their axis, Earth is the exception, where a collision with the moon many years ago may have caused its days to be a lot shorter than the other rocky planets. Saturn and Jupiter rotate fairly quickly on their axis.
The distance of a planet from the sun does impact the surface of a planet. Planets closer to the sun, like Mercury and Venus, tend to have hotter surfaces, while planets further away, like Mars and the outer planets, have colder surfaces. This difference in temperature can influence the types of surface features found on each planet.
they both relate to distance.
There is an IQ Score Comparisons chart here: http://www.assessmentpsychology.com/iq.htm
There is no necessary connection between mass and distance. The mass of a planet does not affect its orbital speed, for example. However the "giant planets" are further from the Sun than the less massive "terrestrial planets". The outer (more massive planets) contain a lot of gases. So, they would surely lose a lot of their mass if they were nearer the Sun. (In fact, we have found planets called "hot Jupiters" orbiting other stars. These are Jupiter type planets, but they orbit very close to their star.)
oliver twist
well, fight me
The Russian Revolution
distance over time equals the speed/velocity.
The relationship is described by Kepler's Third Law.
because it's a planet like all but it is the biggest
i wan the answer