Want this question answered?
300kg
laws of photochemical
No, it states the equivalence of mass and energy.
they were shocked
how do the concepts of motions relate to safety and predation
Yes
It mean the equivalence ratio is equal to 1.
1). How much total real-world area you want to show. 2). What size piece of paper you want to show it on.
An equivalence relation on a set is one that is transitive, reflexive and symmetric. Given a set A with n elements, the largest equivalence relation is AXA since it has n2 elements. Given any element a of the set, the smallest equivalence relation is (a,a) which has n elements.
No. The equivalence point is reached when the moles of titrant equals the moles of analyte.
Equivalence capacitance for system of two capacitors in parallel circuit is Ce = C1 + C2 Equivalence capacitance for system of two capacitors in serial circuit is 1/Ce = 1/C1 + 1/C2
An equivalence relation ~ on A partitions into pairwise disjoint subsets called equivalence classes so that 1. Within each class, every pair relates 2. Between classes there is no relation i.e. [x] = {a (element) A | a~x} and given two equivalence classes [a] and [b], either [a] = [b] or [a] intersect [b] = the empty set
pH = 5.56 at 36.0 ml(equivalence point)
it depends on the strength of the acid and base used: so, strong acid + strong base = neutral equivalence point strong acid + weak base = acidic equivalence point weak acid + strong base = basic equivalence point In this case, HCl is a strong acid, and Na2CO3 a weak base. Therefore, the equivalence point will be slightly acidic.
Type equivalence occurs when two variables are of the same type. For example, if both variables are int (integer variables), they are of equal types. Equivalence can also occur with two different types that are compatible with each other.
The equivalence point is the point in a titration when the amount of added standard reagent is chemically equal to the amount of analyte. The end point is the point in a titration when a physical change occurring immediate after the equivalence point
Not necessarily.