answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the consequences of not peer reviewing an article?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are some drawbacks to peer reviewing?

Perhaps one of the greatest drawbacks of peer reviewing is that there may be personal bias that may cloud the actual review. Also, the person reviewing the material may not be knowledgeable on the subject.


What is the process for which scientists grade another scientist work before it can be published?

The general term for this is not "grading" but "peer review."


Explain peer review article to a scholarly practitioner?

Here's a really great article about explaining the peer review process: http://www.ehow.com/how_4765842_explain-peer-review-process.html


If you look for someones name in an article what are you doing are you a scanning the article b previewing the article c reviewing the article or d understanding the article?

You are a. Scanning the article


What is meant by peer edited article?

I think that this is the same as "peer-reviewed" article. Usually peer-reviewed articles are found in scholarly, academic type of journals. Peer-reviewed means that the article in the journal was analyzed, or reviewed, by the author's peers. It has to do a lot with credibility. When an author submits an article to a peer-reviewed publication, the editors of that publication will have a group of experts analyze and check the content and resources to make sure that the article is legitimate and NOT made-up. Many teachers in college prefer the student to use "peer-review" articles to support their research papers. The following related link can give a little more information on how to find peer-reviewed articles.


Why do kids take drugs?

Stupidity. Peer pressure. Lack of maturity. No real knowledge of the consequences.


What is the difference between reviewing a scientific paper in a conference and submitting a paper during the peer review process?

In a conference, a group of scientists from the same field reviews the paper. In a peer review, members from other fields review the paper.


What is the process called that scientists use to check each othera work?

Peer review


How do you make a review?

Here is a helpful article about review writing: http://readingtomyself.blogspot.com/2009/01/reviewing-for-beginners.html


What do you like about peer-pressure?

It helps people understand their consequences when they do wrong from following the wrong crowd to get social repuatation.


What is an article discussion?

An article discussion is a conversation or debate about the content, arguments, or conclusions presented in an article. It involves reviewing, analyzing, and sharing perspectives on the article's ideas, validity, and implications. Article discussions can take place in various settings, such as academic seminars, online forums, or book clubs.


What are two consequences of giving peer pressure?

Two consequences of being the one to pressure someone into something are disloyalty, and untrustworthy, especially if the person who was pressured is hurt. If you pressure something into something that causes them to get seriously injured or dead, you can be charged with it. Two consequences of being peer pressured into something is being hurt, getting pregnant, losing friends, going to jail and even dieing.