answersLogoWhite

0

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.

User Avatar

Adonis Herman

Lvl 10
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and the welfare?

Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa


What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa


WHAT ARE WELFARE PAYMENTS OR SUBSIDIES?

Costs and conquenses of providing subsidies


What are welfare payments or consumer subsidies?

Costs and conquenses of providing subsidies


What are the cost and consequences of providing welfare and subsidies?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and walfare?

The costs of providing subsidies and welfare include significant financial burdens on government budgets, which can lead to higher taxes or reallocation of funds from other essential services. Additionally, these programs may inadvertently create dependency, disincentivizing work and self-sufficiency among recipients. Consequences can also include market distortions, where subsidies may lead to inefficient resource allocation, and potential political backlash as public perception of welfare programs varies widely. Ultimately, while intended to support vulnerable populations, these measures can have complex economic and social implications.


What are the cost and consequences of providing subsidies?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What is the cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

The cost of providing subsidies and welfare can be significant, often requiring substantial government expenditure that can strain public budgets and lead to higher taxes. While these programs aim to alleviate poverty and support vulnerable populations, they can also create dependency, reduce incentives for employment, and distort market dynamics. Additionally, misallocation or inefficiencies in welfare programs can result in funds not reaching those most in need. Balancing the benefits of support with the economic implications is a key challenge for policymakers.


What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare!?

The basic costs of welfare spending and subsidies to industries are higher taxes to pay for them or borrowing funds for the same purpose. The economic health of a nation is in danger if a balance cannot be found that both keeps an economy sound and also provides aid to peoples and certain industries. An example of "certain" industries, before anyone falls off their chair is to subsidize health care & hospitals.