answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the contributions made by managemnt gurus to strategic management?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Management

The quality gurus theories and their differences in tqm?

You question is very general in nature and there can not be specific answer. Perhaps you can visit site like http://QualityGurus.com to know about the works of various quality gurus like Deming, Juran and Crosby.


What did W Edwards Deming have to say about total quality management?

These are the 14 points by Deming: 1.Create constancy of purpose toward improvement of product and service, with the aim to become competitive and to stay in business, and to provide jobs. 2.Adopt the new philosophy. We are in a new economic age. Western management must awaken to the challenge, must learn their responsibilities, and take on leadership for change. 3.Cease dependence on inspection to achieve quality. Eliminate the need for inspection on a mass basis by building quality into the product in the first place. 4.End the practice of awarding business on the basis of price tag. Instead, minimize total cost. Move toward a single supplier for any one item, on a long-term relationship of loyalty and trust. 5.Improve constantly and forever the system of production and service, to improve quality and productivity, and thus constantly decrease costs. 6.Institute training on the job. 7.Institute leadership (see Point 12). The aim of supervision should be to help people and machines and gadgets to do a better job. Supervision of management is in need of overhaul, as well as supervision of production workers. 8.Drive out fear, so that everyone may work effectively for the company. 9.Break down barriers between departments. People in research, design, sales, and production must work as a team, to foresee problems of production and in use that may be encountered with the product or service. 10.Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and targets for the work force asking for zero defects and new levels of productivity. Such exhortations only create adversarial relationships, as the bulk of the causes of low quality and low productivity belong to the system and thus lie beyond the power of the work force. •Eliminate work standards (quotas) on the factory floor. Substitute leadership. •Eliminate management by objective. Eliminate management by numbers, numerical goals. Substitute leadership. 11.Remove barriers that rob the hourly worker of his right to pride of workmanship. The responsibility of supervisors must be changed from sheer numbers to quality. 12.Remove barriers that rob people in management and in engineering of their right to pride of workmanship. This means, inter alia, abolishment of the annual or merit rating and of management by objective . 13.Institute a vigorous program of education and self-improvement. 14.Put everybody in the company to work to accomplish the transformation. The transformation is everybody's job. (Souce: http://www.qualitygurus.com/gurus )


Where can one enroll into an online business coaching course?

A person looking to enroll into an online business coaching course can find them at the Terri Levine Website. This site offer business coaching courses and free reports to help people grow their business.


What's Henri fayol's administrative theory 14 principal of management?

to forecast and plan - prevoyanceexamine the future and draw up plans of actionto organisebuild up the structure, material and human of the undertakingto commandmaintain activity among the personnelto co-ordinatebind together, unify and harmonise activity and effortto controlsee that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practiseFayol also synthesised 14 principles for organisational design and effective administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:specialisation/division of labourA principle of work allocation and specialisation in order to concentrate activities to enable specialisation of skills and understandings, more work focus and efficiency.authority with corresponding responsibilityIf responsibilities are allocated then the post holder needs the requisite authority to carry these out including the right to require others in the area of responsibility to undertake duties. Authority stems from:that ascribed from the delegation process (the job holder is assigned to act as the agent of the high authority to whom they report - hierarchy)allocation and permission to use the necessary resources needed (budgets, assets, staff) to carry out the responsibilities.selection - the person has the expertise to carry out the responsibilities and the personal qualities to win the support and confidence of others.The R = A correspondence is important to understand. R = A enables accountability in the delegation process. Who do we cope with situations where R > A? Are there work situations where our R< A?"judgment demands high moral character, therefore, a good leader should possess and infuse into those around him courage to accept responsibility. The best safeguard against abuse of authority and weakness on the part of a higher manager is personal integrity and particularly high moral character of such a manager ..... this integrity, is conferred neither by election nor ownership. " 1916A manager should never be given authority without responsibility--and also should never be given responsibility without the associated authority to get the work done.disciplineThe generalisation about discipline is that discipline is essential for the smooth running of a business and without it - standards, consistency of action, adherence to rules and values - no enterprise could prosper."in an essence - obedience, application, energy, behaviour and outward marks of respect observed in accordance with standing agreements between firms and its employees " 1916unity of commandThe idea is that an employee should receive instructions from one superior only. This generalisation still holds - even where we are involved with team and matrix structures which involve reporting to more than one boss - or being accountable to several clients. The basic concern is that tensions and dilemmas arise where we report to two or more bosses. One boss may want X, the other Y and the subordinate is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.unity of directionThe unity of command idea of having one head (chief executive, cabinet consensus) with agree purposes and objectives and one plan for a group of activities) is clear.subordination of individual interest to the general interestFayol's line was that one employee's interests or those of one group should not prevail over the organisation as a whole. This would spark a lively debate about who decides that the interests of the organisation as a whole are. Ethical dilemmas and matters of corporate risk and the behaviour of individual "chancers" are involved here. Fayol's work - assumes a shared set of values by people in the organisation - a unitarism where the reasons for organisational activities and decisions are in some way neutral and reasonable.remuneration of staff" the price of services rendered. " 1916The general principle is that levels of compensation should be "fair" and as far as possible afford satisfaction both to the staff and the firm (in terms of its cost structures and desire for profitability/surplus).centralisationCentralisation for HF is essential to the organisation and a natural consequence of organising. This issue does not go away even where flatter, devolved organisations occur. Decentralisation - is frequently centralisaed-decentralisation !!! The modes of control over the actions and results of devolved organisations are still matters requiring considerable attention.scalar chain/line of authorityThe scalar chain of command of reporting relationships from top executive to the ordinary shop operative or driver needs to be sensible, clear and understood.orderThe level of generalisation becomes difficult with this principle. Basically an organisation "should" provide an orderly place for each individual member - who needs to see how their role fits into the organisation and be confident, able to predict the organisations behaviour towards them. Thus policies, rules, instructions and actions should be understandable and understood. Orderliness implies steady evolutionary movement rather than wild, anxiety provoking, unpredictable movement.equityEquity, fairness and a sense of justice "should"pervade the organisation - in principle and practice.stability of tenureTime is needed for the employee to adapt to his/her work and perform it effectively. Stability of tenure promotes loyalty to the organisation, its purposes and values.initiativeAt all levels of the organisational structure, zeal, enthusiasm and energy are enabled by people having the scope for personal initiative. (Note: Tom Peters recommendations in respect of employee empowerment)esprit de corpsHere Fayol emphasises the need for building and maintaining of harmony among the work force , team work and sound interpersonal relationships.to forecast and plan - prevoyanceexamine the future and draw up plans of actionto organisebuild up the structure, material and human of the undertakingto commandmaintain activity among the personnelto co-ordinatebind together, unify and harmonise activity and effortto controlsee that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practiseFayol also synthesised 14 principles for organisational design and effective administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:specialisation/division of labourA principle of work allocation and specialisation in order to concentrate activities to enable specialisation of skills and understandings, more work focus and efficiency.authority with corresponding responsibilityIf responsibilities are allocated then the post holder needs the requisite authority to carry these out including the right to require others in the area of responsibility to undertake duties. Authority stems from:that ascribed from the delegation process (the job holder is assigned to act as the agent of the high authority to whom they report - hierarchy)allocation and permission to use the necessary resources needed (budgets, assets, staff) to carry out the responsibilities.selection - the person has the expertise to carry out the responsibilities and the personal qualities to win the support and confidence of others.The R = A correspondence is important to understand. R = A enables accountability in the delegation process. Who do we cope with situations where R > A? Are there work situations where our R< A?"judgment demands high moral character, therefore, a good leader should possess and infuse into those around him courage to accept responsibility. The best safeguard against abuse of authority and weakness on the part of a higher manager is personal integrity and particularly high moral character of such a manager ..... this integrity, is conferred neither by election nor ownership. " 1916A manager should never be given authority without responsibility--and also should never be given responsibility without the associated authority to get the work done.disciplineThe generalisation about discipline is that discipline is essential for the smooth running of a business and without it - standards, consistency of action, adherence to rules and values - no enterprise could prosper."in an essence - obedience, application, energy, behaviour and outward marks of respect observed in accordance with standing agreements between firms and its employees " 1916unity of commandThe idea is that an employee should receive instructions from one superior only. This generalisation still holds - even where we are involved with team and matrix structures which involve reporting to more than one boss - or being accountable to several clients. The basic concern is that tensions and dilemmas arise where we report to two or more bosses. One boss may want X, the other Y and the subordinate is caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.unity of directionThe unity of command idea of having one head (chief executive, cabinet consensus) with agree purposes and objectives and one plan for a group of activities) is clear.subordination of individual interest to the general interestFayol's line was that one employee's interests or those of one group should not prevail over the organisation as a whole. This would spark a lively debate about who decides that the interests of the organisation as a whole are. Ethical dilemmas and matters of corporate risk and the behaviour of individual "chancers" are involved here. Fayol's work - assumes a shared set of values by people in the organisation - a unitarism where the reasons for organisational activities and decisions are in some way neutral and reasonable.remuneration of staff" the price of services rendered. " 1916The general principle is that levels of compensation should be "fair" and as far as possible afford satisfaction both to the staff and the firm (in terms of its cost structures and desire for profitability/surplus).centralisationCentralisation for HF is essential to the organisation and a natural consequence of organising. This issue does not go away even where flatter, devolved organisations occur. Decentralisation - is frequently centralisaed-decentralisation !!! The modes of control over the actions and results of devolved organisations are still matters requiring considerable attention.scalar chain/line of authorityThe scalar chain of command of reporting relationships from top executive to the ordinary shop operative or driver needs to be sensible, clear and understood.orderThe level of generalisation becomes difficult with this principle. Basically an organisation "should" provide an orderly place for each individual member - who needs to see how their role fits into the organisation and be confident, able to predict the organisations behaviour towards them. Thus policies, rules, instructions and actions should be understandable and understood. Orderliness implies steady evolutionary movement rather than wild, anxiety provoking, unpredictable movement.equityEquity, fairness and a sense of justice "should"pervade the organisation - in principle and practice.stability of tenureTime is needed for the employee to adapt to his/her work and perform it effectively. Stability of tenure promotes loyalty to the organisation, its purposes and values.initiativeAt all levels of the organisational structure, zeal, enthusiasm and energy are enabled by people having the scope for personal initiative. (Note: Tom Peters recommendations in respect of employee empowerment)esprit de corpsHere Fayol emphasises the need for building and maintaining of harmony among the work force , team work and sound interpersonal relationships.


Related questions

What is form of guru?

There are tech gurus spiritally gurus many types of gurus.


Who is important to Sikhs?

Our Dus Gurus ( Ten Gurus )


How did the gurus help sacred Hinduism?

gurus are the teachers of Hinduism. Gurus are even worshiped by Gods, according to Hinduism.


What Bible do gurus use?

Gurus don't use a Bible.


When was Armchair Gurus created?

Armchair Gurus was created in 1997.


When was Hoodoo Gurus created?

Hoodoo Gurus was created in 1981.


How many gurus to Sikhs have?

Sikhs have 10 Gurus, all of which has died.


What is the plural form for guru?

The plural form of &quot;guru&quot; is &quot;gurus.&quot;


Are the pictures of the Gurus real?

In a sense, no, pictures of Gurus are not real as there were no cameras in their time. Most of the images of the Gurus are paintings by artists who lived around the same time as them.


Can you make movies with the Gurus as actors as Hindus do with Gods?

no we cannot act as our gurus in movies.


Why did the gurus add ji to their names?

the gurus added ji to their name because it is a form of respect.


What are the release dates for Gurus - 2014?

Gurus - 2014 was released on: USA: 1 January 2014