answersLogoWhite

0

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.

User Avatar

Heber Nader

Lvl 10
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa


What are the costs and consequences of providing the subsidies and the welfare?

Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa


What are the cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing welfare and subsidies?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing subsidies?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What is the cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare?

The cost of providing subsidies and welfare can be significant, often requiring substantial government expenditure that can strain public budgets and lead to higher taxes. While these programs aim to alleviate poverty and support vulnerable populations, they can also create dependency, reduce incentives for employment, and distort market dynamics. Additionally, misallocation or inefficiencies in welfare programs can result in funds not reaching those most in need. Balancing the benefits of support with the economic implications is a key challenge for policymakers.


What are the cost of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequence of providing the subsidies and welfare?

Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.


What are the cost and consequences of providing the subsies and welfare?

Providing subsidies and welfare can lead to significant financial costs for governments, impacting budgets and potentially increasing national debt. While these programs aim to alleviate poverty and support vulnerable populations, they can also create dependency, reduce incentives for work, and distort market dynamics. Additionally, misallocation or inefficiency in these programs may result in limited benefits reaching those in need. Balancing support with fiscal responsibility and economic incentives is crucial to maximize positive outcomes.


What do you think are some of the advantage s and disadvantages of welfare programs that are controlled by each individual states?

Advantages of welfare programs that are controlled by each individual states is providing much needed food, medical care and money for citizens that qualify and it can also redistribute wealth across the population. Disadvantages is the cost to the local governments that provides welfare programs and it is also an opportunity for fraud.