they can burn out the retnas of your eyes
lists the advantages and disadvantages of the compaund and stereoscopic microscope
your fat
you can view these nuts better
halo formation
hfghf
The resolution had limitations of 200 nanometers.
The advantages of a monocular microscope is that it is easier to use than a stereo microscope, a disadvantage of the monocular microscope is that it only has a singular eyepiece, therefore, it is harder to see the image. The advantages of a stereo microscope is having two eyepieces, it is easier to focus the eye, and therefore, you can see a more three-dimensional image. A disadvantage for the stereo microscope is that it is a lot more expensive than the monocular microscope.
Don't u mean microscope, silly billy. A microscope is a science tool. I hope i have helped u and i hope i can answer some of ur other technical questions.
advantage: cheap, multiple lenses, can look at live specimens. disadvantage: poor resolution, poor magnification
An EM is basically of 2 types. Scanning Electron Microscope and Transmission Electron Microscope. Yes definitely it is used to magnify and resolve specimens but a living specimen cannot be used. Only dead are used. This is due to certain disadvantages that come along with this microscope. If need further details over the microscope uses and types then let me know.yea...i completely agree wif yuh... :)
The speciman you are viewing must be in a vacuum, and be coated with a metal film, therefore the specimen can't be alive and if its a Transmission Microscope- Speciman must be extrememly thin so that the electrons can pass through them. The image is black and white.
Cannot provide spatial resolution below the diffraction limit of specific specimen features http://www.microscopyu.com/articles/fluorescence/fluorescenceintro.html