ignorant leges non excusat means that ignorance of a given law is not an excuse to that criminal charge.
Ignorantia legis non excusat is Latin for "ignorance of law excuses not". This is a legal term meaning a person who is unaware of a law can still be punished for breaking the law. The thought is that just because you don't know about a law doesn't make it okay to do something.
This distinction is not adequate.
differentiate between complusory and non-compulsory insurance and examples of each
Some non-gradable antonyms of the word "intelligent" include "ignorant," "unintelligent," "stupid," and "foolish."
because he was a filthy ignorant Jew
Things sacred are things that are religious and holy. Things secular are things that are non-religious, wordly or non-spiritual.
No. Felons may not own, possess, or have access to firearms - no distinction in the law is made between violent and non-violent felons.
because she probably is being completlely ignorant and makes mistakes over and over again!
Personification - attributing human characteristics to non-human entities. In this case, the smoke is described as lazy and ignorant, human qualities.
places or objects belonging to citizens and noncombatants
The laws of SOME states, may make a distinction between 'violent' and 'non-violent' felon offenders when they are making certain decisions or taking certain actions (i.e.: expungement - pardon - etc) but many opther states (and the federal criminal code) make no such distinction - a "felon" is a "felon."
ignore the ignorant