Want this question answered?
There are three main pieces of evidence to support the Kinetic Theory of Matter1) Brownian Motion 2) Diffusion 3) Thermal Expansion:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)Thanks guys xxHope this helps!!Good Luck! xx
The particle nature of light is illustrated by the photoelectric effect.
matter made up of one type of particle is called ____________ .
The theory states that both matter and light exhibit wave and particle nature which leads tointerference effect i.e; when the wavelenght is <<<< the scale which we use it ,behaves as particle and when wavelenght >>>>the scale it behaves as wave.
The photoelectric effect was pretty definitive evidence that light is a particle (well, at least sometimes a particle).
There are three main pieces of evidence to support the Kinetic Theory of Matter1) Brownian Motion 2) Diffusion 3) Thermal Expansion:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)Thanks guys xxHope this helps!!Good Luck! xx
Matter waves have both particle and wave nature. This concept was first put forward by Ervin Schrodinger I believe. There is also a formula for calculating different entities of matter waves.
According to De Broglie all the matter follows both particle nature and wave nature.The wave thus associated with the matter is called a matter wave.
A quark is the smallest particle in matter.
The particle nature of light is illustrated by the photoelectric effect.
Diffusion is evidence for particle models because it causes diffusions
Albert Einstein's Photo-electric effect is one of the proof of the particle nature of light. The experiment on the wave particle duality is another proof pf the particle nature of light.
The ISBN of Particle Dark Matter is 9780521763684.
The particle nature of light is illustrated by the photoelectric effect.
Particle Dark Matter was created in 2010-01.
Particle Dark Matter has 762 pages.
The way I see it is that neither one is true, we don't (yet) know the true nature of matter, and that the best we can do is to use the models we do understand to explain it.