answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the evidence of the particle nature of matter?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What evidence supports the particle nature of light?

There are three main pieces of evidence to support the Kinetic Theory of Matter1) Brownian Motion 2) Diffusion 3) Thermal Expansion:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)Thanks guys xxHope this helps!!Good Luck! xx


What is the nature of matter waves?

Matter waves have both particle and wave nature. This concept was first put forward by Ervin Schrodinger I believe. There is also a formula for calculating different entities of matter waves.


What is matter wave?

According to De Broglie all the matter follows both particle nature and wave nature.The wave thus associated with the matter is called a matter wave.


What is the name of the smallest particle of matter?

A quark is the smallest particle in matter.


What are the proofs of the particle nature light?

The particle nature of light is illustrated by the photoelectric effect.


Explain why diffusion is evidence for particle models?

Diffusion is evidence for particle models because it causes diffusions


Proofs of the particle nature of light?

Albert Einstein's Photo-electric effect is one of the proof of the particle nature of light. The experiment on the wave particle duality is another proof pf the particle nature of light.


What is the ISBN of Particle Dark Matter?

The ISBN of Particle Dark Matter is 9780521763684.


Which phenomenon demonstrates a particle nature of light?

The particle nature of light is illustrated by the photoelectric effect.


When was Particle Dark Matter created?

Particle Dark Matter was created in 2010-01.


How many pages does Particle Dark Matter have?

Particle Dark Matter has 762 pages.


How will you explain the wave-particle duality of matter?

The way I see it is that neither one is true, we don't (yet) know the true nature of matter, and that the best we can do is to use the models we do understand to explain it.