This is typical of nuclear plants where the fuel costs are low compared with fossil fuel costs.
No its not a fossil fuel
Fossil fuel power stations typically cost about $2.1 dollars per watt to build solar stations around $7 at present. The efficiency is increasing and costs are falling. This of course does not represent the cost to the consumer. In addition it does not take into account all the various other costs and the advantages and disadvantages of each. Fuel (fossil stations), poor sunlight (solar stations). Maintenance costs are similar for single plants but solar stations do not have the capacity of fossil fuel stations.
Carbon Dioxide, particular matter, mercury and radioactive trace elements are released/emitted from the fossil fuel thermal power stations and cause damage to the environment. Also, paying for the fuel, clean up and remediation of pollution-prevention. :)
The cost of fossil fuel power plants varies widely depending on factors such as location, technology, and scale, but as of recent estimates, the capital costs typically range from $1,000 to $5,000 per installed kilowatt (kW). Operational costs can also differ significantly, with ongoing expenses including fuel, maintenance, and compliance with environmental regulations. Additionally, fluctuations in fuel prices can substantially impact overall costs. Overall, while fossil fuel plants can offer relatively low initial capital costs, long-term economic and environmental factors may influence their viability compared to renewable energy sources.
Oil is a fossil fuel.
Fossil fuel is cheap
Fossil
Sorry, no, wool is not a fossil fuel.
Gasoline is a fossil fuel.
Typical fossil fuels are used to build the turbine and construct it. Once built wind is the main energy component for the wind turbine itself. Fossil fuel plants run on standby (not producing power yet consuming fuel) to backup these systems. This fuel is ignored to maintain the "green" status of Wind systems.
Yes it is a fossil fuel.