Only some of these are expressed in the Human Development Index, a composite scale that has three dimensions: life expectancy at birth, adult literacy rate and mean years of schooling, and income as measured by real gross domestic product per capita.
Read more: human-development-index
Yes
Yes. It's ranked in the Very High Human Development column on the Human Development Indicator (#31).
HDI is Human Development Index which is a Development Indicator which helps rank countries and makes it easier for someone to profile an LEDC or an MEDC
human development index
One indicator of the human resource development climate in a healthcare center is the prevalence of OSHA protocol. This helps protect workers and patients both from injury.
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic used to rank countries by level of "human development" and separate "very high human development", "high human development", "medium human development", and "low human development" countries. The statistic is composed from data on life expectancy, education and per-capita GPI (as an indicator of standard of living or income) collected at the national level using the formula given in the Methodology section below. There are also HDI for states, cities, villages, etc. by local organizations or companies.
moniter
Economic growth is just a key for development but not satisfactory indicator because its it does not consider the individual development of the mass of the member of state. It just explains the raise in per capital income which is at national levle and not individual level for incitance it does not explain about life expectance,human development index,physical quality of life index ect
In my opinion that indicator of developement isinstitutional affactiveness is the indicator of development and different country there are different indicatoer of development some country will to increse in per capti incomesome will decrese in population and some will increse in population
A lead indicator of revenue, a lag indicator of R&D expenditure.
This is because it is hard to tell which indicator one has to use to measure development. For example, should you only focus on human development, GNP of the country, or equal participation in political participation?. From what I have read so far, the UNDP is focusing on the Human Development index to measure development which, according to me is not enough to measure development. For example, if you take a look at the 2006/2007 data, Myanmar is more developed than India and China, a country with gross human rights violation and almost no human Rights accountability is claimed to be more developed than countries like India. So, I would say that finding the right indicator is a hard thing to do in this regard. P.s, I am not Indian and there is no bias to my comment.
indicators which has been added as a measure of the extent of democratic participation in social and political decision making but it has not been given extra weight ....