Hunters roamed in search of prey, a source of meat. Gatherers also roamed, in search of fruits and grains to harvest. Both provided food for the tribe.
However, there was one big difference between them: plants didn't run away, and didn't try to kill you back. For that reason, hunters needed more speed, more endurance and better tools (i.e. weapons) than gatherers generally did.
Eventually, gatherers evolved into farmers, raising both crops and domesticated food species. Hunters never really went away; though in most cultures hunting itself became just one job specialization out of many, and possibly even relegated to the status of an outdoor sport.
hunters and gatherers They were hunter-gatherers
The differences between the Iroquois are numerous. The Iroquois Confederacy had a constitution. They were farmers and lived primarily in the northeast. The Cheyenne were nomadic in nature. They were hunters and gatherers and lived in the plains.
they are gatherers they gather anything they can so put in gatherers
no
They were farmers
no of course they were .................................................. not!
no
they are hunters they eat there prey fast
These hunters and gathers are called aborigines.
They were hunter-gatherers and farmers.
Hunters primarily rely on hunting animals for food, while gatherers focus on gathering plants, fruits, nuts, and other natural resources. Hunters often use tools like weapons to capture their prey, while gatherers use their knowledge of the environment to find and collect food. Hunter-gatherer societies typically exhibit a combination of hunting and gathering activities for survival.
the seminole indans were hunters and the women grew crops