Want this question answered?
Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television was created in 1978.
"The Good Wife".
The arguments placed to annex the Philippines to the US were to bring civilization to the country and to have commercial and military bonds between the two countries. These arguments favored annexation.
Formal arguments
i think ti was called Judge Judy or something like that
Because they can trick you into buying things you don't need with muddy arguments bordering on pure lies.
Try to use the naughty corner and if they are good use treats. if bad you can make them do more chores or ban them from TV or computers Try not to cause arguments glad to help C.Burgess
It means you may think your "mate" [as the Australian would say] is beautiful, until you have a reason to argue with them.
There is some debate on closed circuit tv and how it may or may not abuse privacy. In some cases it is used for surveillance which can be a good thing. However there are arguments that even though it is a public place it is still intruding into one's privacy.
Formal arguments are the named arguments defined by the function. Actual arguments are those arguments that were passed to the function by the caller.
Finally what can be said about the impact of TV is that it can be both good and bad. Most of the time it all depends on who is watching. Similar to what was mentioned in the arguments above it has been proven that the television is not all bad or all good, but both.The first supportive argument discusses the bad language of the television. The argument discusses around three main impairing factors, which are profanity, informality and slang. Despite that watching TV impairs you language, the counter post states that it can also help people develop their vocabulary. Although the counter post had well-presented arguments the supporting argument was stronger, due to the fact that it had a more reliable source.The second supportive argument discusses the bad knowledge that TV provides. Besides the fact that the arguments are enhanced by good sources they also clearly affirm what people believe in general. The counter post about good knowledge did not have as strong arguments as the supportive argument.The counter and supportive argument regarding TV's influence on one, has shown that the side effects of watching TV is rather bad than good. The reason why it is considered more trustworthy is because of its sources, which are medical doctors. Not only could the scientific inquiry be read, but it could also be seen in the society. It is reasonable that children's health deteriorates annually, due to the fact that they are prioritizing media before a social life.Finally what can be concluded about television is that overall it does not have a good impact on people. It might be entertaining but nevertheless it all depends on whom and what their watching. Therefore stop watching, start living!-yeshmitha,9th std
Time management and sometimes money depending on the family.