answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The main steps the Supreme Court takes in deciding cases include the writ of certiorari if filed, then the justices hold a conference for discussion of merits. Next, if at least two justices find the case has merit, the attorneys argue their cases before the court. Finally the court holds another conference for decision making.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Applicable constitutional issues, case history, precedents/case law, statutes...

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Wiki answers stinks

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

it raises a constitutional question

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Writ of Certiorari

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Opinion

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Marbury :)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

I eat my own disease people really look at these answers feces

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What do the supreme court issue when a case relates to the interpretation of law?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When can US supreme court decisions be modified?

When the issue is again brought before the Supreme Court.


When a lower court decision is appealed to the supreme court what will most likely happen?

Depends on the issue. The Supreme Court can send it back to the lower court, not hear it, or they can hear it.


What is the issue in the four important cases the Supreme Court is about to review?

Supreme Court will review cases from four states on the freedom to marry.


Did the US Supreme Court change the law on legal immigrants and deportation?

No. This issue will probably work its way up to the Supreme Court, but hasn't yet.


Few cases are heard by the supreme court unless they deal with?

Cases the US Supreme Court reviews under its appellate jurisdiction usually involve unresolved or unclear constitutional matters that may have resulted in a Circuit split (different decisions on substantially the same question by two different US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts) or a decision from any lower appellate court that is in opposition to the Supreme Court's constitutional interpretation or to established precedents.


If an inferior court wants guidance from the supreme court on a particular question of law it may issue a what?

A certificate


What is the constitutional issue of the supreme court case Wisconsin verses yoder?

The constitutional issue of the supreme court case Wisconsin verses yoder indicated that, children should not attend school full time, in order for them to get religion time.


What can the judicial branch do to check the power of the legislative branch?

they can issue a supreme court decision


The supreame courts usually what kind of cases?

There is no telling which case or what kind of a case the Supreme Court will hear. If a case is simple, it never will get to the Supreme Court. Cases that reach the Supreme Court have gone through one or more appeals processes. Sometimes a appeal reaches the Supreme Court when a federal court of appeals has made a ruling different from another federal court of appeals. In that case, the supreme court is asked to certify an issue. That is a fancy term meaning to play referee. The Supreme Court certifies an issue when it takes up an issue where district courts of appeal have made different rulings concerning the application of the same law. (Sometimes the Supreme Court refuses to take up the issue. In that case it simply states, "Cert. Denied.") Normally, all cases that reach the Supreme Court have come from the Federal Courts of Appeal or the Highest State Court. However, the Supreme Court reserves the right to sit as a court of original jurisdiction. The last time the Supreme Court granted a writ of Habeas Corpus was 1924. It retains that right. I doubt if any member on the Supreme Court has any idea under what conditions that would happen. Still, it retains that right.


Can a police officer bring a narcotic issue in to the federal system?

If what you mean by a federal system you mean a supreme court, then NO. The only person who can bring a case to the supreme court is a lower court. Typically a case will get heard in a circuit court, then if contested, the findings will be reviewed by an appeals court and if it gets farther than that it will be reviewed by a state supreme court and eventually (only if it is a federal issue) it will be heard by the US supreme court. So technically a police officer can't bring it there, but he/she can be the initiator of the case on the lower level.Cheers!


Must Arkansas trial court follow a decision of the US supreme court concerning an issue of federal law?

yes


What does it mean that the US suprem court is the court of last resort in all questions of federal law?

There is no court above the Supreme Court, therefore once they have ruled on an issue there is no higher court to hear an appeal. Their rulings are the last word on the issue.