It is a characteristic or you can say, property of metalsthat - they are LUSTROUS in nature whereas on the other hand, non-metals possess the property that - they are NON - LUSTROUS in nature.Thus, metals can be lustrous and non-metals cannot be lustrous in nature(except iodine, which is a non-metal, but is lustrous in nature).
Non metals are brittle.They are non lustrous. They have low melting point.
Almost all metals are lustrous and shine and some non-metals like Graphite and iodine do have some lustre.
Yes, many metals are lustrous.
Yes, many metals are lustrous.
Lustre Is An Property Of Metals: Thus All Metals Have Lustre However Lead Being A Metal Is Considered To Be Non Lustrous But Actually Lead Is Bright And Silvery When Freshly Cut But The Surface Rapidly Tarnishes In Air To Produce A Dull Lustre Associated With Lead.
Iodine and graphite are two nonmetals that can exhibit a lustrous appearance under certain conditions.
Antimony is a metalloid because it possesses qualities of metals and non-metals such as: a hard, extremely brittle, lustrous, silver-white, crystalline material.
I suppose if I have to pick one, I'd say "nonmetal", because there's no metal called "lustrous". There's no metal called "love" either, so I guess love is also a nonmetal. A better answer might be "the word has nothing to do with the elemental metal/nonmetal dichotomy, and the question is therefore essentially meaningless".
Yes that is one of the reasons they stand out- they aren't metals but are lustrous solids- looking a bit like metals.
yes, metals are lustrous in nature.
No, lustrous is a physical property normally associated with metals, which as usually solid at room temperature. It is a property of metals that is shining.