In direct energy conversion system energy source directly converted into electricity without and working fluid or steam. Direct conversion systems have no moving parts.
1. No conversion of energy into mechanical and to electricity.
2. Less losses in conversion process.
3. More efficient process
4. Cost also reduced
but technology required to improve in this way.
faradys low of electromagnetic inductation
Energy Efficiency
The conversion is from chemical energy to electricity to light energy.
The conversion is from chemical energy to electricity to light energy.
No it is the conversion of potential energy into electrical energy.
Conversion from chemical potential energy to thermal energy.
Reiner Decher has written: 'Energy conversion' -- subject(s): Transmission, Thermodynamics, Heat, Power (Mechanics) 'Direct energy conversion' -- subject(s): Direct energy conversion
Stanley W. Angrist has written: 'Order and chaos' -- subject(s): Thermodynamics 'Solutions manual to accompany Direct energy conversion, fourth ed' -- subject(s): Direct energy conversion
W. R. Benn has written: 'Rotary kiln waste energy recovery and conversion' -- subject(s): Waste heat, Energy consumption, Direct energy conversion
Robert F Steidel has written: 'Hybrid staging of geothermal energy conversion processes' -- subject(s): Turbines, Direct energy conversion
There is no direct conversion.
There is no direct conversion. A gram is a measure of mass. A cup is a measure of volume. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.The masses of equal volumes of the two substances will clearly be very different. So there is no direct conversion between mass and volume: you need to know the density of the substance to enable you to carry out the conversion.
There is no equivalence.A cubic metre is a measure of volume. A kilogram is a measure of mass. So, kcal/m3 is a measure of energy per unit volume while kcal/kg is a measure of energy per unit mass. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.The masses of equal volumes of the two substances will clearly be very different. So there is no direct conversion between mass and volume: you need to know the density of the substance to enable you to carry out the conversion.There is no equivalence.A cubic metre is a measure of volume. A kilogram is a measure of mass. So, kcal/m3 is a measure of energy per unit volume while kcal/kg is a measure of energy per unit mass. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.The masses of equal volumes of the two substances will clearly be very different. So there is no direct conversion between mass and volume: you need to know the density of the substance to enable you to carry out the conversion.There is no equivalence.A cubic metre is a measure of volume. A kilogram is a measure of mass. So, kcal/m3 is a measure of energy per unit volume while kcal/kg is a measure of energy per unit mass. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.The masses of equal volumes of the two substances will clearly be very different. So there is no direct conversion between mass and volume: you need to know the density of the substance to enable you to carry out the conversion.There is no equivalence.A cubic metre is a measure of volume. A kilogram is a measure of mass. So, kcal/m3 is a measure of energy per unit volume while kcal/kg is a measure of energy per unit mass. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.The masses of equal volumes of the two substances will clearly be very different. So there is no direct conversion between mass and volume: you need to know the density of the substance to enable you to carry out the conversion.
George Nickolas Hatsopoulos has written: 'Principles of general thermodynamics' -- subject(s): Thermodynamics 'Thermionic energy conversion'
Usually, the amount of useful energy after a conversion will be less than the original energy. In no case can it be more.Usually, the amount of useful energy after a conversion will be less than the original energy. In no case can it be more.Usually, the amount of useful energy after a conversion will be less than the original energy. In no case can it be more.Usually, the amount of useful energy after a conversion will be less than the original energy. In no case can it be more.
Karl-Joachim Euler has written: 'Energie-Direktumwandlung' -- subject(s): Direct energy conversion
W. H. Bloss has written: 'Elektronische Energiewandler' -- subject(s): Direct energy conversion
Energy Efficiency