Pros: everything can be done in a uniform matter and things can get done quicker
Cons: having too much power and getting overly paranoid about it
pros
Many Tyrants ruled well and helped poor families by cancelling the debts of poor farmers. A tyrant's son does not usually inherit his father's power.
fair to some citizens who had same interests as him
cons
Some tyrants were corrupt. All power was with one person. Tyrants could not claim that they have the right to rule
That the populace is treated as something to be crushed into line rather than a group who should be listened to.
A tyranny is a Dictatorship where the ruler acts consistently badly. As a result, there are really no pros, save that if you are in the tyrant's protected group of people (usually <10% of the population), you are likely living very well. The cons are numerous, usually atrocities against other citizens, denial of fundamental civil rights (freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, searches and seizures without prior authorization, forced relocations, etc.), economic restraints, social stratification, and localized isolation.
pros:
one ruler
fair to some citizens who had same interests as him
cons:
allowed only some people to vote
PROS
Many Tyrants ruled well and helped poor families by cancelling the debts of poor farmers. A tyrant's son does not usually inherit his father's power.
fair to some citizens who had same interests as him
CONS__
Some tyrants were corrupt. All power was with one person. Tyrants could not claim that they have the right to rule
That the populace is treated as something to be crushed into line rather than a group who should be listened to.
Pros:
one ruler
the ruler is fair to the citizens
cons:
Some tyrants were corrupt
all power was with one person
and now, for the fanaly, it is weird
fkdsjafhsdkjahfsjdkfhjdfsdhfsdjfldsjflkksfjklsdkjdsalkfjkdsnfkdsjafkjdlfjkdlsjflkasjgkhdkfj
Pros:
one ruler
the ruler is fair to the citizens
cons:
Some tyrants were corrupt
all power was with one person
and now, for the finally, it is weird
fkdsjafhsdkjahfsjdkfhjdfsdhfsdjfldsjflkksfjklsdkjdsalkfjkdsnfkdsjafkjdlfjkdlsjflkasjgkhdkfj
Tyranny, in the Greco-Roman world, was an autocratic form of rule in which one individual exercised power without any legal restraint. In antiquity, the word tyrant was not necessarily pejorative and signified the holder of absolute political power. In its modern usage, the word tyranny is usually pejorative and connotes the illegitimate possession or use of such power.
PROS
CONS
they dicuss how they should rule their government
-people might agree with how the dictator rules.
-the dictator gets power crazy and makes everyone do as he/she says
-people dont agree with how he/she is ruling the country and attempt to stop it.
pros and cons of physiocrats
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros: goodness cons: badness
pros are + and cons are-
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect
pros= nothing cons=everything
Usually there are no pros or cons.
pros: Unity and cohesion Cons: Corruption