Animal testing is used to help find cures and treatments for common human ailments and diseases. So the banning of animal testing should increase human suffering. This is a "pro" if you believe human suffering is a good thing.
Doctors practice medical procedures on animals before the practice on people. New techniques are often first performed on a handful of animals. Without animal testing, doctors would be forced to practice on people. We could probably find some poor people willing to be tested. This would help reduce poverty, either if they died or were handsomely paid for their participation. Another "pro."
The pros are that animals have feelings and should be respected.
Try Google Scholar, i think the address is scholar.google.com
Pro: living organism model Con: violates the animal's rights inefficient and ineffective, their anatomy and biological reactions are not the same (look up the thalidomide tragedy)
without animal testing doing a simple thing like brushing your teeth, using an eyeshadow or feedig your cat could end up with you getting cancer, going blind or your cat dying. by ME!
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Well there are no pros.It never works Protesting is a big gap in it!100%is that its hard harsh a crul. they cant find anybody who wants to do it!I HATE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
Animal testing sould be illegal because it is harming the animal.