The requirements to make a peer to peer network are you need a unique name for each computer, a similar network protocol, and supported cabling by the network cards. The computers must have a way to communicate with each other.
In one sense a peer to peer network is easier to maintain only if the number of clients is small. You can't maintain the network from a central location, so if it is easier it is only because the administrative requirements are much less (technically) than a client server network. The disadvantage of maintaining a peer to peer network is that everyone is responsible for the maintenance of their own system. You have to physically go to each device to see what the changes are.
A workgroup is one name for a peer-to-peer network.
False - a peer-to-peer network is simpler.
Yes, peer-to-peer network can be worthwhile on a small network
Peer To Peer Network, A+ Guide To Hardware, page 466
peer-to-peer
A peer-to-peer network is easier to set up.
Peer-to-peer network otherwise known as P2P network
For an Ethernet network, each computer needs a network card and a network cable. You also need a switch - each computer will be connected to the switch.For a wireless network, you don't need cables (that's the whole idea of wireless!), but each computer needs a wireless network card instead. Instead of the switch, you would use a wireless access point.
Network that is designed just to enable share resources is called Peer to Peer Network also called Workgroup in Windows.
The use of one or more servers distinguishes a client/server network from a peer-to-peer network.
It is possible that they do; the reason for this is that in a peer to peer network each workstation is responsible for their own security, backups, virus protection, etc. You can not mandate tool usage in a peer to peer network. In a client server network you can force policies to be obeyed, but not in a peer to peer network.