E
smart
Under what conditions can a human being held morally responsible?
The Federal government is responsible morally for the management of all native land. The United states is morally obliged of the highest trust and responsibility towards the Indian tribes. It establish unique right, conditions and benefits for these tribes.
keep to your morals. dont let them mess with you.
No more than the maker of a car being morally responsible for deaths caused by drunk drivers.
Morally and ethically, yes. Legally, he was in charge of someone else's property and has a responsibility to take reasonable care of it. Losing it is certainly not considered being responsible. So it's really your decision about what you want your son to learn about responsibility and honesty.
It is a citizens responsibility to live within the law, maintain their personal property in good repair and observe civility when dealing with others. It is a duty to serve on a jury, to vote, to report violations of law.
Humans need to be morally or ethically responsible to maintain social order, promote empathy and compassion, and ensure the well-being of themselves and others. Being morally responsible helps individuals navigate complex situations ethically and make decisions that uphold values and principles that benefit society as a whole.
Only when makers of spoons are morally responsible for people that have heart attacks from being overweight. Axe makers are not responsible for a murderer killing someone with an axe. Oil companies are not responsible for the arsonist that uses gasoline to start a fire.
The question of whether everything has a cause intersects significantly with moral responsibility. If every action and decision can be traced to a prior cause, it raises concerns about free will and accountability. Some philosophical perspectives, like determinism, argue that individuals may not be morally responsible for their actions if those actions are predetermined. However, proponents of compatibilism suggest that even within a causal framework, individuals can still be held morally responsible if they act according to their desires and intentions, highlighting a nuanced relationship between causation and moral agency.
It is legal but perhaps morally corrupt.
now adays kids of 13 and 14 are also not responsible for their actions from 15 kids start to become responsible.
Not if it was a legal sale.