i dont undstand exactly what your asking but the name for it is a phythangorean triple like 3,4, & 5
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
The sides of a triangle are its lengths are cannot be negative. However, you could place a triangle on coordinate system and some points where the vertices are could be negative numbers.
A scalene triangle has 3 sides of different lengths An isosceles triangle has 2 sides of equal lengths An equilateral triangle has 3 sides of equal lengths
All three sides have different lengths.
A right triangle * * * * * No, it is a scalene triangle.
The list that accompanies the question doesn't contain any numbers that could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle.
The sides of a triangle are its lengths are cannot be negative. However, you could place a triangle on coordinate system and some points where the vertices are could be negative numbers.
If any of its 2 sides is not greater than its third in length then a triangle can't be formed.
They are Pythagorean triples
-- Each number has to be (more than the difference of the other two) but (less than their sum). -- Count the lengths of the sides. If you get to three and then run out of numbers, it's a triangle.
A scalene triangle has 3 sides of different lengths An isosceles triangle has 2 sides of equal lengths An equilateral triangle has 3 sides of equal lengths
The 3 sides have different lengths
All three sides have different lengths.
An isosceles triangle has 3 sides 2 of which are equal in lengths An equilateral triangle has 3 sides all of which are equal in lengths
There are lots of sets of numbers that fit that definition! But the important thing to remember about triangles is the Third Side Rule, or the Triangle Inequality, which states: the length of a side of a triangle is less than the sum of the lengths of the other two sides and greater than the difference of the lengths of the other two sides. So you can have a triangle with sides of 3, 4 and 5 because 3 < 4 + 5, 4 < 3 + 5 and 5 < 3 + 4; and because 3 > 5 - 4, 4 > 5 - 3 and 5 > 4 - 3. But you can't have a triangle with sides 1, 2 and 8, for example. Just imagine three pieces of wood or three straws with lengths 1, 2 and 8. Put the longest piece, 8, horizontally on the table. Then put the other two, one at each end of the longest piece. Could those two shorter sides ever meet to form a triangle? No, never!-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The length is always positive, so that all real positive numbers can represent the length of sides of a triangle: {x| x > 0}.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Whoever added that to my answer, sorry, I beg to differ! The question asked what SET of numbers cannot represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle. There are infinite possibilities for that. While the lengths are always a set of real positive numbers, not every possible set of real positive numbers is a potential set of numbers that represent the lengths of the sides of a triangle!
A square's sides have equal lengths, and an equilateral triangle's sides also have equal lengths.
A scalene triangle has sides of different lengths while an equilateral triangle has sides of equal lengths