Want this question answered?
Both Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played crucial roles in unifying their respective countries through statecraft and diplomacy. Both leaders utilized diplomacy, strategic alliances, and military force to unite their fragmented nations. However, Bismarck's methods were more focused on using warfare and power politics to achieve unification, while Patel's approach emphasized negotiation and non-violent resistance to integrate princely states into India.
As regards similarities between Bismarck and Patel, I have no specialized knowledge. Both of them used a 3-stage system for uniting their countries; 1) Invite Union, pointing out the advantages. 2) Take advantage of the fact of human nature that people who will not unite FOR anything will unite AGAINST something - Austria/France, or Britain/Pakistan. 3) By the time only a few states are left outside the Union, the Union will be strong enough to incorporate the rest by force.
Answer in the
Otto von Bismarck, the Iron Chancellor of Germany, used a combination of realpolitik, diplomacy, and military force to unify Germany under Prussian leadership in 1871. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, known as the Iron Man of India, played a crucial role in integrating over 500 princely states into the newly independent India through negotiations, diplomacy, and the threat of military force, known as the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach. Both leaders were instrumental in unifying their respective countries through skillful diplomacy and strategic use of power, although in different historical contexts and circumstances.
Buddhism and Confucianism
The disimilarities between Bismarck and patel are: bismark belived that the sheding of blood alone can unify the various states and adopted the famous policy called "Iron and Blood. Bismark used all his tactics to create a war that he wanted to win and create a unified Germany. But Patel used his tactics by providing many offers to the kingdoms that ruled in those times so that they thmselves became unified as India but when this did not work he to went on war. Bismark didnt think more of peaceful means. the similarities between them are that they both wanted their respective countries to be united!!
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
The Romans adopted Greek mythology.
The Romans adopted Greek mythology.
The military rule is the form of government that many countries adopted after the war.
They adopted the customs of other cultures which made it easier to maintain control of their vast Empire
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.
They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.