answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the similarities between methods adopted by Bismark and sardar patel in unification of their countries?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the methods and policies adopted by otto von Bismarck and sardar vallabh bhai patel?

Both Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played crucial roles in unifying their respective countries through statecraft and diplomacy. Both leaders utilized diplomacy, strategic alliances, and military force to unite their fragmented nations. However, Bismarck's methods were more focused on using warfare and power politics to achieve unification, while Patel's approach emphasized negotiation and non-violent resistance to integrate princely states into India.


What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the methods adopted by Otto Von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel?

As regards similarities between Bismarck and Patel, I have no specialized knowledge. Both of them used a 3-stage system for uniting their countries; 1) Invite Union, pointing out the advantages. 2) Take advantage of the fact of human nature that people who will not unite FOR anything will unite AGAINST something - Austria/France, or Britain/Pakistan. 3) By the time only a few states are left outside the Union, the Union will be strong enough to incorporate the rest by force.


Compare the policies and method used by Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhai Patel?

Answer in the


Similarities and differences between the methods adopted by Otto von Bismarck and Sardar Vallabhai?

Otto von Bismarck, the Iron Chancellor of Germany, used a combination of realpolitik, diplomacy, and military force to unify Germany under Prussian leadership in 1871. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, known as the Iron Man of India, played a crucial role in integrating over 500 princely states into the newly independent India through negotiations, diplomacy, and the threat of military force, known as the "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach. Both leaders were instrumental in unifying their respective countries through skillful diplomacy and strategic use of power, although in different historical contexts and circumstances.


Which two belief systems were adopted by the Three Kingdom in 4th-Century AD Korea?

Buddhism and Confucianism

Related questions

Find out Similarities between the methods adopted by sardar patel and Bismarck?

The disimilarities between Bismarck and patel are: bismark belived that the sheding of blood alone can unify the various states and adopted the famous policy called "Iron and Blood. Bismark used all his tactics to create a war that he wanted to win and create a unified Germany. But Patel used his tactics by providing many offers to the kingdoms that ruled in those times so that they thmselves became unified as India but when this did not work he to went on war. Bismark didnt think more of peaceful means. the similarities between them are that they both wanted their respective countries to be united!!


Why was the concept of the world or the unification of all people important to Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why was the concept of one world or the unification of all important to Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why is that there are so many similarities between greek roman mythological figures?

The Romans adopted Greek mythology.


Why is that there are so many similarities between greek and roman mythological figures?

The Romans adopted Greek mythology.


What form of government did new many countries adopt after the war?

The military rule is the form of government that many countries adopted after the war.


What was the concept of one world or the unification of all people important or Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures which made it easier to maintain control of their vast Empire


Why was the concept of one world or the unification of all the people import to Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why was the concept of one world or the unification of all people import to Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why was the concept of ''One World'' or the unification of all people important Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why was the concept of one world or. The unification. Of all people. Important. To Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.


Why was the concept of One World or the unification of all people important to Persia?

They adopted the customs of other cultures, which made it easier to maintain control of their vast empire.