There are two kingdoms of bacteria. The two kingdoms of bacteria are Archaebacteria and Eubacteria. This is taught in biology.
The original first two kingdoms were animals and plants.
This anwser is false. The reason why is because scientists want to make two kingdoms of Monera not two kingdoms of fungi
As biologists learned more about the natural world, they realized that Linnaeus’s two kingdoms, Animalia and Plantae, did not adequately represent the full diversity of life. As a result, the original two kingdoms have today become six kingdoms, with two of those groups used just for classifying bacteria
Well, if you're talking about animal kingdoms, it'd be eubacteria and archaebacteria. They're both bacteria. I was just learning about this in science class yesterday! :D
Aristotle's classification system was mainly focused on plants and animals, the two kingdoms that were most visible and familiar to him. He based his classification on observable physical characteristics and traits, and at the time, these were the most prominent groups of organisms that were recognizable and distinguished easily.
Helium and hydrogen
There are two kingdoms of bacteria. The two kingdoms of bacteria are Archaebacteria and Eubacteria. This is taught in biology.
the two kingdoms that are prokaryates are Archaebacteria and Eubacteria.
Helium and hydrogen
Helium and hydrogen
The two kingdoms in Eukarya that evolved most recently are Animalia and Fungi. They emerged relatively later in the evolutionary timeline compared to other eukaryotic kingdoms such as Plantae and Protista, with Animalia diverging from a common ancestor with fungi around 1.2 billion years ago.
The two kingdoms were the Upper Egypt and the Lower Egypt.
the two bacterial kingdoms eubacteria and archaebacteria
Chemical energy and wind
Chemical energy and wind
A Tale of Two Kingdoms was created on 2007-07-15.