So that the public at large gets a chance to see them. If they were all in private collections, only the owners and their friends would be able to see them. Plus most museums have excellent preservationists that are able to look after the artifacts, and preserve them for the generations to come.
People should keep artifacts in museums so that future generations can view them and learn about the past. Keeping artifacts in a museum helps to preserve the items and limit damage by exposure.
because people can learn from it
Strictly speaking, no. "Aborigines" refers to the noun, the actual people, and should always be capitalised; "aboriginal" is an adjective, I.e. referring to "aboriginal people".
You don't.Aboriginal is an adjective, and it should be written as just aboriginal when describing a culture, e.g. aboriginal tools, aboriginal housing.The word Aborigine is a proper noun because it refers to a race of people.The terms aboriginal and Aborigine are often mixed up.
Archaeologists should not own the artifacts they find because they are considered part of humanity's shared cultural heritage. It is important to preserve and protect these artifacts for future generations and promote their study and understanding. Ownership by individuals can lead to loss, destruction, or exploitation of these valuable cultural materials.
no
As a should question, it is open to different views. No. It is both well-protected and easily accessible in the British Museum. Thankfully, Egypt has done a decent job in protecting its artifacts, but something as crucial as the Rosetta Stone should remain in place that can successfully prevent its destruction or capture. Yes. This is a part of Egyptian history and belongs to the Egyptian people as a national birthright. Dr. Hwass is making a great effort to secure the return of all Egyptian artifacts.
It means that it is a burial site and should be left alone. Removing artifacts or bones from a mound is a Federal Crime. Anyone caught selling these items will be prosecuted and end up in prison.
Leonard Paul is an excellent Canadian aboriginal artist you should look into...others feel free to add!
Yes, artifacts should be returned to their land of origin as they hold cultural, historical, and spiritual significance to the communities from which they were taken. Repatriation helps restore dignity and respect to indigenous peoples, and promotes healing and reconciliation. Additionally, it fosters greater understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures and histories.
Although Troy Westwood is not originally aboriginal, he was adopted by a Dakota family in Sioux Valley as one of their own. To me, that's good enough. He follows the beliefs and ways of life better than most aboriginals. In my books, he is aboriginal.
If it is that nice, the museum might buy it from you. If not you can simply donate it.
Yes, "Indigenous Australian" should be capitalized as it refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia. This shows respect and acknowledges the cultural significance of their identity.
I personally believe it should as it is art, it all depends on someone's opinion and who owns the art museum.