Want this question answered?
Scientific data that has not been experimentally tested is unreliable.
Scientific information is available on the Internet, on television, and in magazines. Some sources are more trustworthy than others. The most reliable scientific journals. However, These articles are often difficult to understand. Sometimes, summaries of these articles are published for the public.Many scientists write books for the general public. These publications are trustworthy if the scientist is writing about his/her field of study. Reliable books may also be written by people who aren't scientists but who are knowledgeable about a particular field.Usually, the most reliable Internet are government or academic webpages. Commercial webpages are often unreliable because they are trying to sell something.
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
IPv4 basic characteristics: Connectionless - No connection is established before sending data packets. Best Effort (unreliable) - No overhead is used to guarantee packet delivery. Media Independent - Operates independently of the medium carrying the data.
unreliable sources show nothing close to many reliable sources
It's not regulated
They are unreliable.
WikiAnswers is not unreliable! There is nothing but good things to say about it. I recommend it to all of my friends when they need information.
The information may not be reliable. It has many different articles on their site. If an article submitted does contain the proper facts information could be unreliable.
He is not dead. Wherever you heard that is an unreliable source of information
Scientific data that has not been experimentally tested is unreliable.
No. Wikipedia is not unreliable. It is a service that provides free information across 500 million people a month. People CAN get in and edit information. Most of the time the information is accurate and when it is inaccurate, others change it pretty quickly.
When the information is posted without a specific source, the validity of the information cannot be determined or evaluated.
Information on this subject can be seen on an encyclopedia known as Wikipedia, although it may be unreliable it gives a lot of information. Information can also be found in other locations such as 'SuperiorFires' and 'Telegraph'.
Digital systems are known to be somewhat unreliable. This is why it is important to keep a paper backup of information whenever possible. This is especially important for businesses.
Information about the YouTube website can be found from a number of online sources. While potentially unreliable in some respects, the Wikipedia webpage has extensive information on the website.
Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.