(i)Time frame within which it must occur.
(ii)Location where after shocks are likely to occur.
They can't predict the time or the location of earthquakes. They can provide probable data on expected times and location an earthquake with better assurance than in the past but not exact times or dates.
Earthquakes, like the weather, are the result of many factors that can interact in any number of different ways. These include the varied movements of the crust and the magma beneath it, the variations in the type of rock, and the separation of plates and faults that cannot be directly observed. Some faults will remain stable for hundreds of years, and the exact amount of strain that builds up is very difficult to accurately measure. The rock movements that result in surface quakes can occur at various depths, complicating the forecast of what movements will follow.
yes and no. You cant predict exactly when but you can observe it
DEFENSE----you cant win if you cant score.
cant predict.
it depends some in your 50's 60's or older you cant really predict it like you cant predict starting your period
There are- but the earthquakes that happen are so small that you probably cant even feel them.
it might but i cant predict the future
They can and they do. Even I can and I'm not a geologist. I predict an earthquake will happen somewhere along the San Andreas fault sometime in the future. Unless you mean why can't they predict with detailed accuracy? Predictions require models based on past experience which they gain and refine as time goes on. They just don't know everything now but in the future they may.
Avon Lake can have earthquakes but there is a very slim chance because Avon Lake is not near a fault line.
its the goverment man u cant trust the system
i dout it because we cant prevent earthquakes and we dont know when an earthquake will occur so no you cant prevent one