The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
They wanted it to made because it was important for the government to be nationalized.
The anti-federalists were against a strong central government. They feared that a strong federal government will destroy the hard won liberties they accomplished during the Revolutionary War.
it did not guarantee basic rights
There were two main Anti-federalist arguments: a) The Constitution gave the federal government too much power and the people weren't represented by it. b) There was no Bill of Rights in the Constitution, and the people's rights weren't put in writing and guaranteed. There were some other, less pressing arguments, such as the ratification process (only 9 out of 13 had to ratify, and some thought all 13 states should have to ratify for the Constitution to go into effect). Also, some didn't like the fact that there was no mention of God in the Constitution. Others were angry that the states couldn't print money. c) They were not so happy about going back to a strong central government because if the government got too strong it could become a monarchy, and they just got out of one
There were many arguments made against the adoption of the United States Constitution. The most widely expressed argument was the fact that a centralized government system could weaken the rights and freedoms of the people throughout the country that the document was intended to provide for.
They wanted it to made because it was important for the government to be nationalized.
they supported the right to tax the country, the ratification of the constitution, and they supported a strong central [federal] government
The main role of the Federalist Papers was to raise support for the ratification of the Constitution.
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?
One of the arguments for not having a Bill of Rights was the thought that it would be misconstrued to mearly be a list of your rights. There should be further information on this debate in the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers.
to stress the need for ratification of the Constitution
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The Federalist papers are one of the reasons the U.S. Constitution was ratified. The main purpose of the Federalist Papers was to explain what the Constitution meant and to fight the Anti-Federalists propaganda.
The need for a stronger central government.
The need for a stronger central government.