answersLogoWhite

0

One of the arguments for not having a Bill of Rights was the thought that it would be misconstrued to mearly be a list of your rights. There should be further information on this debate in the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What were Arguments ft and for ratifying the constitution?

Arguments for ratifying the Constitution included the need for a stronger federal government to maintain order, regulate commerce, and provide for national defense. Proponents, known as Federalists, argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances would prevent tyranny. Conversely, opponents, known as Anti-Federalists, argued against ratification, fearing that a strong central government could infringe on individual liberties and states' rights. They pushed for a Bill of Rights to safeguard personal freedoms, which ultimately helped secure ratification.


What papers were written to win the support for the ratifying of the Constitution?

Bill of Rights.


Which complaint was greatest barrier to ratifying the constitution?

It did not include a Bill of Rights.


What does the editor of this newspaper support ratifying the constitution?

The editor of the newspaper supports ratifying the constitution because it provides a framework for governing the country, protects individual rights, and establishes a system of checks and balances. They believe that ratifying the constitution will help create a more stable and unified nation.


What was the principal motivation for drafting the bill of rights?

To Protect the rights that were not specified in the Constitution. In my opinion it also was a compromise for the Anti-Federalists, since this was main reason for not ratifying the Constitution.


What were arguments against ratifying the constitution?

it did not guarantee basic rights


Why did the Massachusett ratifying convention propose that a bill of rights be added to the constitution?

They proposed a series of amendments to guarantee citizens' rights.


What was the name of the work Madison co-wrote in defense of ratifying the Constitution?

The bill of rights. ithink...........


Who opposed ratifying the constitution ND what was their major argument against ratification's?

Opponents of ratifying the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists, which included figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason. Their major argument against ratification centered on the fear that the new federal government would be too powerful, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticized the lack of a Bill of Rights, believing it was essential to protect citizens' freedoms from potential government overreach.


Why did the anti-federalist not like the constitution?

The Anti-Federalists did not like the new strength the central government would possess. Additionally, the constitution did not have a Bill of Rights when the states were in the ratifying process.


What do these headlines demonstrate about the process of ratifying the Constitution?

The constitution had strong support but also strong opposition


What are arguments for amending a Bill of Rights to the original Constitution?

The argument for adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution was to protect individual freedoms of the citizens.