Want this question answered?
No. The Judicial Branch, headed by the US Supreme Court, is excluded from the constitutional amendment process. If the Court had the right to shape the Constitution and interpret its meaning, they would have too much power.Article V of the Constitution provides for the document's amendment by a joint venture between Congress and the States.
The US Supreme Court's power to shape public policy is limited because it is not a legislative body and its role is to interpret and apply the law, not make new laws. The Court's decisions are binding, but they can only address the specific legal issues presented in a particular case, and they must base their decisions on the law and Constitution. Additionally, the Court relies on the other branches of government, particularly the executive branch, to enforce its decisions.
Presidential appointees to the Supreme Court serve as justices and have the authority to interpret the Constitution and make decisions on important legal issues. They participate in reviewing cases, hearing oral arguments, and writing opinions that shape the direction of the law in the United States. Their role is to uphold the Constitution and ensure the fair and just application of the law.
The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution of the United States and deciding on legal issues that have been appealed from lower courts. This includes making final decisions on matters related to federal laws, constitutional rights, and disputes between states. The Court's rulings establish precedents that shape the interpretation and application of laws throughout the country.
shay"S rebellion
If it's for E2020 the answer is BRIEF. The Supreme Court is unlike any other court because the cases have all ready been heard and tried in lower courts. The lawyers have to prove that their argument is based in law and the constitution . They have to cite cases and law to the court in a determined set time. The justices will return a decision several months after the case is heard. They do not all have to agree in their decisions, but what they write may shape future cases and law. To begin the process a brief with the court is filed.
No. The Constitution authorizes the Legislative branch (Congress) to create bills, which only become laws after the President signs them. The Constitution grants the President veto power (he can say no) as a check on the power of Congress. But Congress can override the President's veto if they can muster a two-thirds (super-majority) vote, which is a check on the power of the President.The Supreme Court evaluates laws for Constitutionality, but only if someone who is affected by the law is directly, personally and significantly damaged by it and there is some way the court system can address the problem and provide a solution. In most instances, the case must progress through a trial court, exhaust all of its lower court appeals, and petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari (request the Court review the case) before the Supreme Court can make any determination. If no one ever presents a case challenging a law, the Supreme Court has no recourse to overturn it as unconstitutional. Declaring laws unconstitutional is a check on the power of Congress.If the Court does find a law unconstitutional and nullifies the law, responsibility for enforcement passes to the President (the Court can't enforce its rulings). The Supreme Court does not make laws directly; their rulings shape laws indirectly. They do not participate in the Legislative (law making) process. This is a check on the power of the Supreme Court.The Legislative ProcessCongress passes billsThe President approves or disapproves of the billIf the President approves, he (or she) signs the bill into lawThe Judicial ProcessThe Supreme Court may eventually get to review the law for constitutionalityIf the Supreme Court decides the law is unconstitutional, they can nullify itThe President is responsible for enforcing the Supreme Court's decision
It is an advantage for a president to appoint Supreme Court justices because they can shape the ideology and direction of the Court for decades to come. Justices serve for life, so a president's appointment can have a lasting impact on the interpretation of the Constitution and the outcome of significant legal cases. This allows a president to leave a lasting legacy on the court's rulings and contribute to their party's stance on key issues.
If it's for E2020 the answer is BRIEF. The Supreme Court is unlike any other court because the cases have all ready been heard and tried in lower courts. The lawyers have to prove that their argument is based in law and the constitution . They have to cite cases and law to the court in a determined set time. The justices will return a decision several months after the case is heard. They do not all have to agree in their decisions, but what they write may shape future cases and law. To begin the process a brief with the court is filed.
This was the first sitting Supreme Court of the USA. Every decision made by that court established the original precedent for all subsequent cases in the USA. Perhaps the most important was Marbury vs Madison where the precedent was established for the Supreme Court to review laws for "Constitutionality".
The Constitution, which outlines the structure and powers of the government, is still a fundamental document that shapes how our government operates today. Additionally, political parties play a significant role in influencing the government's operations by advocating for different policies and ideologies. Finally, the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing the Constitution, ensuring that the government operates within its legal boundaries.
establishing the dominance of the judicial branch over the legislature