The State brings an action against a defendant.
The State
theft is generally regarded as a criminal case but if the victim who was stolen from wishes to take action to recover the losses, then it will be a civil case as well
In a criminal case it is the accuser. In a civil case - think Judge Judy - it is the Plaintiff
Unlike the arson case, which was a criminal case, Aaron's divorce action was a civil case.
with an illegal action and intent
There is no such thing as mixing civil and criminal actions in the same court action. If criminal charges arise as a result of a civil case action they will be charged and prosecuted seperately from the civil trial.
Judicial actions are divided into the civil (suits by persons against persons) and the criminal (actions by the state against persons). Criminal action (prosecution) is brought against individuals alleged to have violated criminal laws.
I have heard of of a criminal copurt "dismissing" a case but I have never heard of a criminal court "rejecting" a case.
In civil law, the party who is served with the papers beginning the civil action, and is defending the lawsuit is called the "defendant"; the party who brings the lawsuit is called the "plaintiff". In the strictest sense, the person in a criminal 'lawsuit' not a civil proceeding, is called a "defendant". The party, in the criminal action, who brings the lawsuit, a criminal proceeding, is called the "State". The representative for the criminal action against the is a Prosecutor. Please see the discussion page for further notions about using the word "defendant" instead of the label "accused" in a criminal proceeding.
Haven't seen the movie, but I suspect that the answer is in the title. no
It depends on whether it is a criminal case or a cvil case and what act constituted the contempt action.
WHAT ABOUT a criminal case in MD ????