Keep climbing the judicial steps to you get to the attorney general and grand jury.
The lawyer had enough evidence to prosecute.
It isn't your job to prosecute the rapist, it is the district attorney's. Take it to the police, and let them figure it out.
We have enough evidence to prosecute Mr. Smith for money laundering.===================================================It is a good job that they do not prosecute you for not writing your own sentences.
Have you had sufficient to eat? The police did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute.
The overwhelming evidence is that it happened.
"Disclosure."
The evidence is overwhelming that President Obama was born in Honolulu, HI.
The evidence of the crime was overwhelming. There was no evidence that anyone had been in the house for months. He was unable to provide a scrape of evidence to back up his story.
Prosecution is the legal process of bringing an alleged criminal offender to trial. The district attorney and his office file charges against the defendant(s) and present evidence at a trial. The accused normally has legal representation for his defense.
The District Attorneys office makes the decision whether or not there is enough evidence to go forward with charging someone with a crime.Added: The above question and answer addresses only formally "charging" the defendant in court, and is separate and apart from the question of establishing the Probable Causenecessary for a Grand Jury to hand down an indictment.
Some examples are: To prosecute is to accuse someone of something or put them on trial. You shouldn't prosecute someone unless you have solid proof.
They can.. Typically a recorded admission is transferred into a written document and that is used in court. But the recording can be admitted as evidence and played at the trial depending on the judges and district attorneys wishes. The defense could argue that the admission was coerced and can argue that it not be listened to.