A law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. It doesn't change. A theory is the explanation but those can and do change.
A theory and a law serve different purposes in science. A theory explains why something happens based on evidence and research, while a law describes a phenomenon or pattern observed in nature without necessarily explaining why it occurs. Therefore, a theory cannot "become" a law because they are fundamentally different in terms of their function and scope.
Because they differ
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
A scientific Theory is when it tries to explain something in an experiment that happens repededly in nature or the natural world. A scientific law is when there is repeated behavior in an experiment but cannot be explained.
mass cannot change quanity if it is not added or removed
A scientific law means it is always, absolutely true. If it were found untrue, it would not be a law, just a theory.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken.
Cell theory cannot be changed to cell law because they are two different concepts. Cell theory is a collection of scientific principles that describe the basic properties of cells, while cell law does not exist as a recognized scientific concept.
it is a law.
The Hamurabi Law is the first codified law in history. This was good because the people know the law and the ruler cannot change the law based on a whim. Therefore, the power of the ruler was limited to what is written and if he wanted to change it, it would have taken time. Today, the law is based on the constitution of a country. It is hard to change it, and laws cannot disagree with what is written in the constitution unless it is changed.
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''