If Adolf Hitler had not committed suicide, he likely would have been tried firstly of genocide. Undoubtedly he would have also been tried for various other war crimes also.
he imposed a lot of corruption like the way he killed the jews and how he put the world on edge for about 7years .
Adolf Hitler is generally accepted to have been guilty of war crimes and genocide on a massive scale. If he were to stand trial, it would be for a number of things including those two items.
"Impose to" is not idiomatic English. You can say "impose on" in a sentence such as "I hate to impose on you, but do you happen to have any Grey Poupon?"
The legality of suicide varies by jurisdiction, with many places considering it legal, while others might impose restrictions or support for assisted suicide under certain circumstances. However, legality does not inherently equate to morality; societal, cultural, and individual beliefs heavily influence moral interpretations of suicide. Many people view suicide as a tragic outcome that may stem from mental health struggles, suggesting that compassion and support are more morally appropriate responses. Ultimately, the moral implications of suicide are complex and deeply personal, often challenging the boundaries of legality and ethics.
He could pass any laws without verification from the Reichstag - if he deemed it an emergency. Inevitably, Hitler abused this power and took absolute control.
Impose is a verb.
I do not seek to impose my will on you. How long did the jury deliberate to impose their sentence?
In many jurisdictions, you cannot be arrested specifically for failing to stop a suicide, as there is typically no legal obligation for bystanders to intervene. However, laws vary widely, and in some places, there may be "duty to rescue" laws that impose a responsibility to assist individuals in peril. Additionally, if someone actively encourages or assists in a suicide, that could lead to legal consequences. It's important to understand local laws and regulations regarding such situations.
No. The only relevant evidence for this claim would be instances where Hitler was unable to impose his will on Germany on things that mattered to him. A much more plausible view is that he personally was too lazy and disorganized to be an entirely effective dicatator.
To impose countervention is to penalize those who have penalized you.
Hitler was extremely authoritarian. He required the population of the Third Reich to accept everything that he said as absolute law, and was able to impose a death sentence on anyone who failed to do so.
I think a close antonym for impose would be "respect".