Yes. They are both cats, one is just wild and the other is domestic. alalallalalallaljkj;sjj;akfjg;akdfja;gkfgkajdgdfgjakfgj
cats are related to big cats like: tiger's, lions, pumas and leopards etc, elimac3
because tigers are really big cats and are related to cats
Other tigers Lions. The other big cats. The small cats Mammals Vertebrates
There both cats but different kinds and different relations.
Zebras are accually related to horses, not cats. Even though the zebra has brown/black stripes and is white like a white tiger, zebras are still related to horses, not cats.
Lions, leopards, and jaguars are all species that are related to the tigers.Kingdom:AnimaliaPhylum:ChordataClass:MammaliaOrder:CarnivoraFamily:FelidaeGenus:Panthera
Binghamton Tiger Cats was created in 2008.
Hamilton Tiger-Cats was created in 1950.
The tiger is bigger then the lion.
Siberian Tiger
Lions belong to the genus Panthera which includes the closely related species of tiger, leopard, snow leopard and jaguar.
Neither. The Tasmanian tiger (actually the thylacine) was a marsupial; that puts it in whole separate subclass from dogs and cats, which are placentals. The thylacine occupied the ecological niche which is filled in other places by placental predators. All of the animals mentioned are mammals, but that's about as closely as they're related.