What caused Rutherford to propose a revised model of the atom?

Answer 1

he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it.