They were a militaristic society.
They were a militaristic society.
They were a militaristic society.
They were into conquering places..( had a grate army)
They were into conquering places..( had a grate army)
The Assyrians were distinguished by their militaristic society and expansive empire, focusing on conquest and administration, unlike the Sumerians, who are known for their city-states and innovations in writing and agriculture. While Sumerians laid the foundation for urban civilization and Ionians contributed to early Greek philosophy and science, the Assyrians were characterized by their advanced military organization and brutal tactics in warfare, which enabled them to dominate a vast territory in the Near East.
They were militaristic. Meaning they were imbued with militarism. The definition of the word 'Militarism' is: A political orientation of a people or a government to maintain a strong military force and to be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests
They were militaristic. Meaning they were imbued with militarism. The definition of the word 'Militarism' is: A political orientation of a people or a government to maintain a strong military force and to be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests
They were militaristic. Meaning they were imbued with militarism. The definition of the word 'Militarism' is: A political orientation of a people or a government to maintain a strong military force and to be prepared to use it aggressively to defend or promote national interests
no.
No. Sumerians did. :)
The Sumerians were conquered by the Assyrians and those were conquered by the Chaldean.
Sumerians