Want this question answered?
Viruses have some characteristics of life but these are not considered living organisms as they are non cellular.
no otherwise it would be considered living
No. The characteristics of living things are: Movement, respiration, sense, growth, reproduction, energy and nutrition. You need to have all of them to be considered alive. e.g. A car moves, takes in air, uses energy and some have sensors that can sense their surroundings but you cannot say a car is alive.
A disease can be biotic or abiotic. If it is a bacteria it is biotic, but if it is a virus it is always abiotic, because viruses are not considered living because they cannot reproduce on there own, do not consume energy or give off waist.
A living thing is usually defined as having movement, respiration, sensation, growth, reproduction,excretion and nutritional needs. A good way to remember this is MRS GRENN. Rocks do not have all of these characteristics, so by this definition, they are not considered to be living.
Viruses are not classified in a kingdom because they do not possess all the characteristics of living organisms. They lack cellular structure, cannot carry out metabolic processes on their own, and cannot reproduce without a host cell. As a result, they are often considered biological entities that straddle the line between living and non-living.
Viruses are considered non-living because they are not cells. They do not exhibit some characteristics of life such as reproduction and growth.
Viruses have some characteristics of life but these are not considered living organisms as they are non cellular.
no otherwise it would be considered living
they cannot move but they are living things
One of the characteristics of a non-living thing is that it cannot breathe; therefore, the answer is nothing.
No...otherwise it would be considered living!
Yes.it is cause it has all the characteristics of life that's why
Virus cannot considered living. They lack cellular organization
An organism must satisfy seven specific criteria to be considered living. These criteria identify different bodily functions, nutrients needs and physical responses which an organism must display if it is to be considered among the living. Even if one category is left wanting, the organism must be considered dead or non-living. Read more: Seven Characteristics of Living Organisms | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_7421536_seven-characteristics-living-organisms.html#ixzz1HSfM4MrE
No. The characteristics of living things are: Movement, respiration, sense, growth, reproduction, energy and nutrition. You need to have all of them to be considered alive. e.g. A car moves, takes in air, uses energy and some have sensors that can sense their surroundings but you cannot say a car is alive.
A disease can be biotic or abiotic. If it is a bacteria it is biotic, but if it is a virus it is always abiotic, because viruses are not considered living because they cannot reproduce on there own, do not consume energy or give off waist.