Custody was resolved.
Mrs. Jackson (Michael's Mother) gets custody. Debbie Rowe gets visitation and continued Spousal support, even though MJ is deceased, she will continue to get it anyways.
A father can get custody of the children if it can be demonstrated that that is in the best interest of the child. The father being the primary caregiver would help.
Yes. Leaving children unsupervised is considered child endangerment regardless of who has "full custody". That could lead to the parent being deemed unfit and they could lose custody. See related question.Yes. Leaving children unsupervised is considered child endangerment regardless of who has "full custody". That could lead to the parent being deemed unfit and they could lose custody. See related question.Yes. Leaving children unsupervised is considered child endangerment regardless of who has "full custody". That could lead to the parent being deemed unfit and they could lose custody. See related question.Yes. Leaving children unsupervised is considered child endangerment regardless of who has "full custody". That could lead to the parent being deemed unfit and they could lose custody. See related question.
No, unless a custody order is being violated, it is not kidnapping for the Father to move out of state with his own children.
Take it court and fight for custody
Being married or unmarried is not much of a determining factor when it comes to custody nowadays. In order to have custody changed you would need to prove that either your household and parenting abilities are substantially better than the other parent, or that their situation is detrimental to the children. Having a spouse does not necessarily mean that you are better able to care for the children, especially if the other parent has had custody for a significant length of time without the children having any problems in a single parent household.
The very basic answer is yes. Being a suspect is not the same as being formally charged or found guilty. However, there can be a lot of variables. If a judge, family, or children's services feel the child is at risk, there is a chance that custody can be taken away, put in protective custody, or custody can be put on a supervised basis.
In a divorce, the other spouse has to be notified of the motion for divorce, and they also have to be notified of your intention to sue for custody fo the children. So, no, it's not possible to be granted a divorce or custody of the children without the other spouse being notifiied of the intent.
If you are not divorced then both parents have equal rights regarding custody, decision making and control of the children. If a couple chooses to live apart one party must obtain a court order to get sole custody of the children. That party would need to convince the court the other parent is unfit and awarding sole custody to the moving party is in the best interest of the children. A husband would not be favored for sole custody simply on the basis of being a man. There must be extenuating and serious circumstances for the court to award custody to one parent. You should consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction who can review your situation and inform you of your rights.
When determining if joint sole custody is the best arrangement for children, factors to consider include the parents' ability to communicate and cooperate, the children's relationships with each parent, the children's preferences, the parents' work schedules and living arrangements, and any history of abuse or neglect. It is important to prioritize the children's well-being and choose a custody arrangement that promotes their emotional and physical health.
To have the responsibility of being the guardian for children. Also means to have placed someone under arrest for some crime.
Talking to his lawyer would be the best idea. You can then return to the judge and appeal that the order is not being followed, so perhaps custody should be changed (provided you can prove that you are responsible enough).
Until a decision by the court on full custody. A standard practice is to drag it out as long as possible resulting in the court than being unwilling to change what the children have become accustom to.