Beethoven - he was rich anyway, so didn't need the money from his compositions so he composed for fun essentially, and people liked his music so didn't commission their own.
no
no
patronage
Patronage contributed to government incompetence and fraud by giving government jobs to people who had helped a candidate get elected. This was unfair treatment to the rest of the society.
The patronage system was a structure in which musicians and composers were supported and employed by wealthy patrons, such as nobility or aristocrats, who provided financial security in exchange for their artistic services. Mozart, despite his prodigious talent, struggled within this system as he often sought independence and the ability to compose freely, rather than being tied to a single patron. His dependence on patronage limited his financial stability and artistic freedom, leading him to seek new avenues such as public concerts and opera to gain wider recognition and income. Ultimately, while he benefitted from some patronage, it also contributed to his financial struggles throughout his life.
Political Patronage
patronage system
Yes.
beethoven
This system allowed Mozart to practice his music. With a patronage, he had all the life necessities he needed and was able to concentrate on music and not other work.
Spoils System?