Relevent Orders, Rules, and Regulations"
field manuals, regulations, orders
Army leaders can use a number of research tools to support the decisions they make. These tools include relevant orders, Rules and Regulation, field manuals, and other published materials.
Army leaders can use a number of research tools to support the decisions they make. These tools include relevant orders, Rules and Regulation, field manuals, and other published materials.
Relevent Orders, Rules, and Regulations" field manuals, regulations, orders
A title held by local leaders in the area could have been "village chief" or "tribal elder." These roles were often responsible for governing and making decisions for the community.
In simple terms it is a database that is used to provide information for a business to help it make decisions. It could be things like sales information on products, their costs of doing business in a particular location or anything like. They will use information that is provided to help make their decisions.
A quotation from a respected source or author could lend support to your discussion.
The constitution does not limit such activity - so a constitutionalist could certainly/potentially support stem cell research. Although, as a whole, being a constitutionalist would probably have little to do with this decision.
Janus-faced leadership refers to leaders who display conflicting or contradictory behaviors depending on the situation. Examples could include leaders who are inspirational and motivating in public, but critical and micromanaging in private, or leaders who advocate for transparency and openness, but make decisions behind closed doors without input from others.
During Australia's colonial years, England still made the decisions on behalf of Australia. The main disadvantage of this was that English leaders did not understand the conditions in Australia. England did not understand the different social circumstances of the early colony, so could not possibly understand the political and economic ramifications of any legislation it passed which would be enacted in Australia.
If research in a private school is directly funded by the Department of Education, it may raise questions about the independence and objectivity of the research outcomes. This funding could influence the focus of the research to align with governmental priorities or policies. Additionally, it might lead to potential conflicts of interest, where the findings could be used to justify funding or policy decisions. Transparency in the research process and outcomes would be essential to maintain credibility and trust.
I'm not. Someone could support a conservation orgainzation like World Wildlife Fund or directly support someone doing research on pandas (or maintaining panda habitat).
An example of an uncited claim in a research paper could be stating that a certain medication is 100 effective without providing any references or sources to support this assertion.