it is very easy to say buy u researching it
Science is tentative meaning as new scientific discoveries are made modifications can be made.
if someone finds a loop hole in the experiment
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
The theory that prevailed before the scientific revolution, at least in Europe, was that everything the human race needed to know could be found either in the bible or in the writings of Aristotle.
How do waves cause erosion
if someone finds a loop hole in the experiment
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it is rejected. A hypothesis is basically just an educated guess, so it could be wrong, or right.
It has no scientific basis.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
yes,because it could be right or wrong while when the theory became a law it will not be replace anymore.
A scientific hypothesis could be described as a reasonable guess. If it checks out, it can be promoted to the status of a scientific theory.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
lalala
The theory that prevailed before the scientific revolution, at least in Europe, was that everything the human race needed to know could be found either in the bible or in the writings of Aristotle.
No. It is important to appreciate that 'science' is not a thing, it is a method of obtaining better descriptions of aspects the physical world around us. The scientific method involves the following: 1. Use new or existing observations, interpret them and produce a theory that describes their origin and cause. 2. Use the theory to predict one or more observations in the future. 3. Test the theory by ensuring that it is consistent with new observations and that its predictions are correct. 4. If the theory is not consistent with further observations or its predictions fail, test to see whether it can be modified to account for the new facts. Go back to step 2. 5. If it cannot be satisfactorily modified, the theory is incorrect and a fundamentally new theory is required. Go back to step 1 By no stretch of the imagination could music be described as having any of those steps, so does not qualify as a science.
Although it is proven and true, there is a .00001% that is could be false. So therefore it can't be a scientific law. That makes it a theory. There are very few scientific laws and only obvious facts are scientific laws. Like gravity.
An idea that explains something could be called a theory. Good scientific theories are falsifiable which means you could prove it to be false. You can never prove a theory to be true, you can only provide evidence that supports the theory.