Seria completamente rígido, sin movilidad alguna. seria una estatua o lo que se conoce como esqueleto de piedra.
It doesn't keep your joints in place like a skeleton.
Your skeleton has bones that are connected by joints, which allow them to bend in certain directions. If it weren't for that, you could not curl up on the couch.
no we could not because joints enable smooth movement within our bones
Joints play a crucial role in allowing movement and flexibility in the body. They also provide support and stability to the skeleton, enabling activities such as walking, running, and bending. Additionally, joints help in the distribution of forces during physical activities and protect the bones from wear and tear.
could cellular respiration happen without photosynthesis explain your reasoning
Maybe I would be a jellyfish, or a beetle. Some people have metal or carbon fibre replacements for bones, so maybe you could have your entire skeleton replaced. It's a big job, though; and expensive.
A metaphor for a skeleton could be "the framework of existence." This comparison suggests that just as a skeleton provides structure and support for the body, the fundamental aspects of life or a concept serve as the underlying framework that holds everything together. It implies that without this foundational structure, everything would fall apart or lack coherence.
Your joints will hurt if the synovial fluid hardens and joints become stiff.
it could be from 15-30lbs without everything on it.
People would be persecuted and sent to jail without a fair trial.
immovable joints can't move and movable joints could move they are the same because immovable joints and movable joints are both made up of two or more jointsDifference: the movable joint moves, and the unmovable joint, does not.Alike: they both consist of 2 joints or more.
Aids in movement of joints without pain, otherwise the movement would be bone on bone and could be very painful.