The wind does not always blow, and it may not blow where you need the power.
The byproducts from nuclear energy plants pose a threat to the environment and public health if they are not disposed of properly. There is always a small chance of a complete meltdown of a nuclear plant, which would contaminate the environment for miles around the site.
There seems little point in trying to answer the question " what will happen if we do this ?" unless we first ask "could we do this ?" and get a positive answer. It is fairly obvious that trying to put the universe in a tube would pose some major engineering difficulties, but the real problem is philosophical. The universe is everything. The whole of space, and the whole of the matter and energy that is in that space. If we try to put the universe in a tube, where would we get the material to make the tube, and where can we find the space to put it in ? The old, old problem of how you lift yourself by your own bootstraps pales by comparison.
The biggest problem is sterilization and the prevention of cell division. The body will quit healing and fall apart due to the lack of repairs from day to day wear and tear.
he
What makes you think that it should decay precisely into an electron and a positron, rather than some other option?Anyway, in any such particle conversion, certain quantities must be conserved. Some of these conservation laws are strict (no exceptions are known to exist), some not (now and then there is an exception). For the proposed reaction, you should consider the following conservation laws:Conservation of mass/energy - the electron and the positron have much less mass than the neutron. This would not pose a significant problem, since they could move away from each other at a high speed - the missing mass/energy would be present in the form of kinetic energy. This indeed happens in some particle reactions.Conservation of momentu - no problem here, either.Conservation of electric charge - no problem here.Conservation of baryon number - this would NOT be conserved in your proposed reaction. Please note that this is not a strict conservation law; there are known violations. However, violating the baryon number in a particle conversion is quite uncommon. In this case, the neutron has a baryon number of +1, the proton (one of the decay products of the actual decay) also has a baryon number of +1, while electron + positron would have a baryon number of 0.
If in minute amounts, then it could not pose any problem.
well there is radiation, that could pose a problem, you could also be addicted and could get eye problems, there a long list
I am no expert but, if it's something flammable and it's down far, then that could pose a problem.
Tin can pose a health issue if there is a lot of it, or it is being burned, cut, or has sharp ends that could harm someone. Tin can rust and that's where the problem lies.
yes.sometimes it will
They may pose a problem when swimming, but otherwise they pose no problems.
It could kill them or harm their environment.
fish pose
Asteroids & meteors are celestial bodies which could'nt make into a planet.there sizes ranges from about yard to about a football field & they travel at great speeds.and when they come into contact to earth this whole of kinetic energy is converted into a huge amount of energy which could be eqivalent to some tonnes of TNT & could destroy life on earth. hence,these always pose a threat to mass extinction.
Rottweilers are naturally protective towards their owners, as they are extremely loyal. I would not try to make them overly protective, as it could pose to be a problem in the future.
Could do any chair poses, example would be standing on it and doing any pose.
The first route posed the problem of not being able to get through.