England
At some point in their past, many countries have had small areas where anarchy was the ruling system, but none have ever been completely run that way.
No. Anarchy is the absence or nonrecognition of a government. Countries may occasionally fall into anarchy, Somalia's a pretty good case these days, but they can't be said to be "run" by one.
Most countries no longer have an anarchy government.
s
There are anarchist in all nations, but no nation is run by anarchy.
Anarchy refers to a state of disorder due to the absence of authority or a governing body. Currently, there are no recognized countries that are considered to be in a state of complete anarchy. However, there are regions within countries, such as parts of Somalia, Libya, and Yemen, that have experienced periods of anarchy due to civil unrest, failed governance, or conflict. It's important to note that anarchy is a complex concept and often misunderstood in political discourse.
Somalia is the best example of this, in the world today.
never
An anarchy has no rules or rulers. As a result a country is an anarchy but cannot be ruled by an anarchy, The closest to anarchy comes in countries where there are numerous factions each claiming to be in charge. These usually resolve into two or three groups each attempting to take over.
Anarchy is not an implemented political system in any country. There are regions of recognized countries where the official governments cannot extend power leading to a general anarchy, such as Somalia, but these countries are not "intentionally" anarchic.
Samila
There aren't any countries who are deliberately using anarchy. However there are a few whose governments are so weak that they can reasonably be said to exist in a state of anarchy. Somalia would be one example.