Laos.
Because Laos is closer to the equator.
Laos has a higher temperature than the UK.
Laos, because it is closer to the equator.
Laos is much closer to the equator than Yugoslavia. Yugoslavia is the latitude of New York City. Laos is further south than Florida.
Laos.
Laos since Laos is much closer to the equator.
Laos. Because Laos is closer to the equator.
Yugoslavia is no longer a country, but that area now houses parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia. As the capital of Yugoslavia was Belgrade, the current capital of Serbia, we will use the data from this city in comparison to that of Vientiane (Laos' capital). In terms of geographic position, one would assume that Laos would have higher temperatures year-round, as it is situated in the warm, tropical South-East Asian region just above the equator. In contrast, Yugoslavia was located in the mountainous region of Eastern Europe, much further from the equator. Meteorological data supports this statement, as the World Weather Information Service states that the year-round average highest temperature for Vientiane, Laos is between 28 and 32o Celsius. Through the same website, Belgrade, Serbia (previously Yugoslavia) has an average year-round highest temperature of a much greater range - between 5 and 250 Celsius. Thus, year-round, Laos would generally have higher temperatures than what was once Yugoslavia.
Laos because it is closer to the equator!!
Laos would generally have higher temperatures year-round compared to Yugoslavia. Laos is located in Southeast Asia near the equator, which results in a tropical climate with consistently warmer temperatures. Yugoslavia, on the other hand, is located in Europe and has a more temperate climate with distinct seasons, including colder temperatures in the winter.
sorry i have no idea* Probably Chile because it is closer to the equator than Yugoslavia. *